So by giving them an agreement that protected head count you gave away more in concessions to protect that headcount and ultimately lost because as you said the company didn't want to manage headcount. Why did the CWA come out so much better than the IAM? I'm no fan of the CWA but they protected far more scope and have wages and benefits more in line with other carriers, just ask john john.700UW said:It takes two parties to reach an agreement.
And no union would agree to a 46% cut in the workforce.
Funny I don't see you criticizing amfa for not agreeing to that either.
And we gave the comany a full and complete offer that met the ask but not with the pension termination. They rejected it as they said "we don't want to manage people and it kept too many people on the payroll."
So once again don't let the facts get in you way.
Josh