Why Tim Nelson is Dangerous to IAM-represented employees at United Airlines

Status
Not open for further replies.
Socplat13,

Let me ask you this. What do you consider "invonuntary furlough". Lets say that a UA station currently staffed with UA mainline employees is reduced to all UAX flights. The company decided to "vendor" the work out, but give the employees furlough packets for available stations. If the employee chooses to take the furlough, would'nt that be considered vonuntary? That is where you guys dropped the ball. The dates are all well and good, but if your not willing/can't move for whatever reason, the company will point to the language you agreed to and say, sorry he/she "CHOSE" not to move therefore it is considered a "voluntary" furlough. We at US lived almost that exact same language. Why can't you see that? And I am by no way a Tim supporter, many on here can verify that fact, so can you help us understand why that language is ironclad in the above scenario?


jet job or socplat13,

Answer please?

Crickets anybody?
 
Nelson doesn't work at UAL that makes him the carpet bagger
Jet job, I have requested that the United employees on the main facebook sites conduct a poll asking if they want my assistance in preparing and spreading publications and videos with a view that dissents from the district. Presently, the pool has been a 100% Yes. In approaching a TA or anything in life, I think a fair view of things should entertain dissenting voices for a different perspective. And your United brothers and sisters have legitimated my opinion on this matter by, thus far, voting 100% for me to present the view of dissention for them. I would humbly ask that you respect the decision by the brothers and sisters at United
 
You just cant help yourself, can you? so now that you are on. Are you gonna flip the first week in December?
 
Socplat13,

Let me ask you this. What do you consider "invonuntary furlough". Lets say that a UA station currently staffed with UA mainline employees is reduced to all UAX flights. The company decided to "vendor" the work out, but give the employees furlough packets for available stations. If the employee chooses to take the furlough, would'nt that be considered vonuntary? That is where you guys dropped the ball. The dates are all well and good, but if your not willing/can't move for whatever reason, the company will point to the language you agreed to and say, sorry he/she "CHOSE" not to move therefore it is considered a "voluntary" furlough. We at US lived almost that exact same language. Why can't you see that? And I am by no way a Tim supporter, many on here can verify that fact, so can you help us understand why that language is ironclad in the above scenario?

crickets
 
Oh and BTW senority protections are not the same as scope protections. You do understand that, right?
 
Come on now jet job and socplat13, you are quick to call tim on his lack of timely responses, look in the mirror much. Pot meet kettle, as the saying goes. seriously, can you or can you not answer the qustion I posed to both of you?


All I hear are crickets from the both of you.
 
jet job and socplat13,


How do you expect people to take you seriously, when you are unwilling to answer a sipmle question?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Back
Top