Who Paid The Loan?

[Bob Owens]

OUCH!!!!
Spanked again NW.

[post="185908"][/post]​

Isnt it funny how they dissapear once they are revealed?

 

[Nightwatch]

The LM2 form of 2001 does not reflect loans given in 2000, it is for the year 2001...duh.

You might assume you spank me, but I know the truth behind your amfa deceit, go tell your line to someone who'll fall for it.

 

[High Speed Steel]

The LM2 form of 2001 does not reflect loans given in 2000, it is for the year 2001...duh.

You might assume you spank me, but I know the truth behind your amfa deceit, go tell your line to someone who'll fall for it.

[post="189509"][/post]​

Nightwatch,

I have found alot of amusement with the responses of the amfa boy's on this topic. They are just fine with the idea of eliminating job's! Reaching into the pockets of those they have solicited for representation, who are not lucky enough to enjoy the benifits of the elitist agenda they support and have "succumbed to lay off"...! But with the tables turned, they react with a whole different reaction with the suggestion that it may be their own pockets that will be emptied to repay a loan afforded them. It is funny that they believe they are immune to the misfortunes of the amfa!

You know, the amfa tends to "feed upon their own"

-----------------------------------
amfa: The YUGO of the labor movement
Where bargaining means YOU GO....!

 

[Bob Owens]

The LM2 form of 2001 does not reflect loans given in 2000, it is for the year 2001...duh.

You might assume you spank me, but I know the truth behind your amfa deceit, go tell your line to someone who'll fall for it.

[post="189509"][/post]​

All you have to do is actually look at the LM-2.

http://union-reports.dol.gov/olmsWeb/docs/..._20010831_0.pdf

Its right there, outstanding loans are listed, not just new loans. Are you just obtuse?
Its pretty clear; 'Loans outstanding at start of period", then right next to it " loans made during period". Right there on page 25 of 38. The loans that were made prior to the reporting period where no payments were made are on page 27 of 38.

By the way, when was the last time you signed an LM-2?

So to anyone who is interested all you have to do is click on the link, look at the facts as documented in this form filed with the Federal government, or take NWs word for it and assume that everyone else, the DOL, even the TWU and myself are wrong.

So who is trying to decieve?

 

[DECISION 2007]

So you're telling NW that amfa will NEVER approach AA emplyees for a dime of remittance for money spent to obtain their membership within amfa.

Is that correct and may I quote all the organizers on this?

 

[Buck]

So you're telling NW that amfa will NEVER approach AA emplyees for a dime of remittance for money spent to obtain their membership within amfa.

Is that correct and may I quote all the organizers on this?

[post="189720"][/post]​

You can quote me on your statement!

 

[Nightwatch]

Give your true name so I know who I'm quoting, or are you the typical amfa mouth? That's what I thought.

DECISION 2007...turn on your fax machine plz

 

[Bob Owens]

Well it looks like Sonny Hall threw himself a nice retirement party with our dues.

Did the members vote on that?

It took place at the Sheraton Hotel & Towers in NYC.

Your boy Dennis Burchette gave a speech in praise of Sonny.

Only about half the TWU Locals bought a page in the program that was handed out at the Convention.

From those who went its estimated that it must have cost well over $100,000.

So how does throwing a party for Sonny Hall benifit the members?

 

[Nightwatch]

It benefits the members by keeping your butt out of office, next dumb question.

 

[Buck]

Give your true name so I know who I'm quoting, or are you the typical amfa mouth? That's what I thought.

DECISION 2007...turn on your fax machine plz

[post="189831"][/post]​

Just quote me or are you afraid of your statement?

 

[Nightwatch]

I'd be afraid to quote a kool-aid drunk.

 

[Bob Owens]

Give your true name so I know who I'm quoting, or are you the typical amfa mouth? That's what I thought.

DECISION 2007...turn on your fax machine plz

[post="189831"][/post]​

Imagine that NW demanding that someone with an alias reveal themselves when he is not willing to do the same. Typical one-way TWU rhetoric.

 

[Buck]

I'd be afraid to quote a kool-aid drunk.

[post="190099"][/post]​

Ok you win. Your comeback almost caused me to pay the TWU the Union Dues I owe them.

 

[Nightwatch]

Imagine that NW demanding that someone with an alias reveal themselves when he is not willing to do the same. Typical one-way TWU rhetoric.

[post="190139"][/post]​

Take your amfa blinders off, he asked to be quoted, you need his real name to quote to others, or are you used to amfa's BS and do not require a name or legitimacy? Typical amfa one-way BS.

 

[Buck]

Take your amfa blinders off, he asked to be quoted, you need his real name to quote to others, or are you used to amfa's BS and do not require a name or legitimacy? Typical amfa one-way BS.

[post="190347"][/post]​

The majority of those at TUL and many in the system know who I am because I am Buck. Do your coworkers call you Nightwatch everyday at work? If you had any, you would realize that you could find the info to quote with. I believe the term is "Go Fish"