White Male Club

NewHampshire Black Bears said:
"And what keeps the Military voting Republican".............and the MAJORITY of Americans electing DEMOCRATS to control the Senate and '1600 !
 
Semper Fi .
Promised "Free Stuff" from the Demorats !
 
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #47
southwind said:
Go spread your white guilt elsewhere. Won't find any here !
 
 
You got yours so phuch the rest right?  
 
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #49
southwind said:
Promised "Free Stuff" from the Demorats !
As opposed to the corporate free stuff from the republicans.
 
Ms Tree said:
As opposed to the corporate free stuff from the republicans.
 
"Democrats are voting for corporate welfare more than Republicans
 
Coburn’s amendment, of course, failed, just as almost all efforts to kill pork and corporate welfare fail. But look at the vote breakdown: Republicans voted 28 to 18 to cut the program. Democrats voted 51-to-2 against the cuts, thus siding with the agribusiness lobby."
 
http://washingtonexaminer.com/democrats-are-voting-for-corporate-welfare-more-than-republicans/article/2500271
 
Ms Tree said:
People in this century feel that woman, minorities, gays ...  have the right to be treated as equals and deserve the right to fight for their country.  Who are you to say they cannot?
 
So what, really and truly now, conveniently prevented you from ever doing so? As you speak of it as some perverse "right" (as if it's a benefit, or some fun trip to Disney World that no one should miss out on) versus a necessary Duty, well... I'm all ears here?
 
"People in this century feel.." Ah! Yes indeed. It's always all about "feelings", isn't it? Sigh! Well...Perhaps we can find some common ground here. What say we assemble at least one whole division that's exclusively women, minorities and gays, and make sure to send them in first. Happy now? Would your "feelings" be satisfied then?
 
Ms Tree said:
Feel free to push for an amendment getting rid of civilian control if you think it's a good idea.
 
 
I don't, but DO feel VERY free to send o-boy-mama and a clinton or two to personally "command" and lead the next attacks on enemy positions anywhere. Just with a couple of them; you could fill the minorities and women's positions quite nicely. Well...only after they've properly received their "sensitivity training" of course. ;)
 
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #58
EastUS1 said:
 
So what, really and truly now, conveniently prevented you from ever doing so? As you speak of it as some perverse "right" (as if it's a benefit, or some fun trip to Disney World that no one should miss out on) versus a necessary Duty, well... I'm all ears here?
 
"People in this century feel.." Ah! Yes indeed. It's always all about "feelings", isn't it? Sigh! Well...Perhaps we can find some common ground here. What say we assemble at least one whole division that's exclusively women, minorities and gays, and make sure to send them in first. Happy now? Would your "feelings" be satisfied then?
Do you think if you ask often enough I'll just cave and spill? 
 
Why do you insist on sending in a segregated force first?  It has been scientifically proven that non-whites are just as capable as whites so I fail to see any support for your argument.
 
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #59
EastUS1 said:
 
 
I don't, but DO feel VERY free to send o-boy-mama and a clinton or two to personally "command" and lead the next attacks on enemy positions anywhere. Just with a couple of them; you could fill the minorities and women's positions quite nicely. Well...only after they've properly received their "sensitivity training" of course. ;)
Where are Cheney and W Bush in you little offensive? 
 

Latest posts

Back
Top