777 fixer
Veteran
- Jul 21, 2004
- 4,792
- 900
National Review seems to think it's real.
http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/227954/born-u-s/editors
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'll give a quick summary of the National Review article. The President was born in the USA, birthers are fools wasting there time when there are other more important issues to worry about, birthers a lot like 9-11 truthers and in some cases are the same people.
I'll give a quick summary of the National Review article. The President was born in the USA, birthers are fools wasting there time when there are other more important issues to worry about, birthers a lot like 9-11 truthers and in some cases are the same people.
Your girl Hillary started it.......LOL
Notice the one says Certification and the other says Certificate......that seems to be interesting.
Guess one is for certifying one was born somewhere on the planet and the other is for Hawaii births I guess. Just sayin'.
Van Jones is a truther......think he is a birther too?
Except that there's no real proof that mom was in the US for the year preceding birth... borders were a lot looser back then.
At this point, it's all moot. But if at least one state enacts a proof law, it's going to be interesting to see where it goes from there...
You need to move out of your mothers basement, get a job, and then maybe talk to a girl.
So says Mr wasted space.The most truthful post of this waste of space thread yet.
National Review seems to think it's real.
http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/227954/born-u-s/editors
It comes down to who would want to be associated with unseating the first black American president and have it recorded into the history books. :blink:
OR
Who wants to be associated with a theory that cannot be proven and get laughed out of town. This is a COTUS issue. If there were any proof that Obama were not a natural US citizen, he would not be in the WH.
Who is in power of Cong has nothing to do with the ability to file a law suit.
Wanna bet?
Even 14.6 percent of the Democrats said they do not consider him a legitimate president, along with 52.2 percent of the Republicans. Significantly, 31.8 percent of the independents said no.
Source WND
Do you think that fact really matters? It's interesting that the same people who go on and on about constitutional requirements can't understand that who's in control of Congress has no bearing on whether or not you can bring a lawsuit to court. Or that in this country if you make an accusation it's up to you to prove it’s true.
The birthers are lot like other conspiracy theory groups. They’re right up there with the moon landing was a hoax crowd, FDR knew about Pearl Harbor, 9-11 was an inside job; Jews control the world etc, etc. They all play from the same play book. SOP is to ignore facts, make up their own "facts", flood you with information because that makes them right, or make points that are totally irrelevant.