Dog Wonder
Veteran
But if at least one state enacts a proof law, it's going to be interesting to see where it goes from there...
Pigs flying would be interesting, too.
And much more likely.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
But if at least one state enacts a proof law, it's going to be interesting to see where it goes from there...
The statute does not provide for the one year period of continuous presence in the United States or one of its territories to be during the year immediately preceding the birth.Except that there's no real proof that mom was in the US for the year preceding birth... borders were a lot looser back then.
Wanna bet?
Even 14.6 percent of the Democrats said they do not consider him a legitimate president, along with 52.2 percent of the Republicans. Significantly, 31.8 percent of the independents said no.
Source WND
Except that there's no real proof that mom was in the US for the year preceding birth... borders were a lot looser back then.
WND a source, that's rather funny dell. More like a partisan hack site that twists the truth, tells half truths or just flat out lies to advance their agenda. Here's what another conservative publication said of the whole birther non-sense.
http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/227954/born-u-s/editors
The director of Hawaii’s health department and the registrar of records each has personally verified that the information on Obama’s birth certificate is identical to that in the state’s records, the so-called vault copy.
Pay close attention to the following Hawaiian legal statute:
“[§338-17.8] Certificates for children born out of State.
(a) Upon application of an adult or the legal parents of a minor child, the director of health shall issue a birth certificate for such adult or minor, provided that proof has been submitted to the director of health that the legal parents of such individual while living without the Territory or State of Hawaii had declared the Territory or State of Hawaii as their legal residence for at least one year immediately preceding the birth or adoption of such child.
(B) Proof of legal residency shall be submitted to the director of health in any manner that the director shall deem appropriate. The director of health may also adopt any rules pursuant to chapter 91 that he or she may deem necessary or proper to prevent fraudulent applications for birth certificates and to require any further information or proof of events necessary for completion of a birth certificate.
(c) The fee for each application for registration shall be established by rule adopted pursuant to chapter 91. [L 1982, c 182, §1]”
Everybody get that?
As long as an adult can walk into Hawaii’s version of the Department of Records and provide proof that they are a legal resident of Hawaii, the document is issued.
The child, on the other hand, could have been born in Hawaii, Kenya, or a back-alley in Budapest.
How much more proof do you disciples of the Messiah need before you will admit that there are legitimate reasons to demand answers on this issue?
What is the source of the information that $1.3 million were spent on attorney fees to defend the "Birther" lawsuits? WND?Yeah.............next time they ask me for my "Birth Certificate", instead of wallking all the way to my dresser, which is all the way in my betroom and getting it, I'm going to tell those basterds to speak to my "$$$ ONE POINT THREE MILLION DOLLAR LAWYERS $$$" !
WorldNetDaily has noted that FEC filings show that Obama's presidential campaign has paid out more than $1.7 million since the election to the law firm of Perkins Coie. Until recently, that firm was home to Obama's campaign lawyer, and now White House counsel, Robert Bauer—the very same DC lawyer, says WND, who has defended Obama in many of the birther lawsuits. Ergo, WND concluded, Obama must be devoting that entire $1.7 million to crushing birthers in court. This is a ridiculous claim: Even after an election is over a presidential campaign has plenty of need for lawyers as it winds down operations and meets campaign finance law requirements.
The child, on the other hand, could have been born in Hawaii, Kenya, or a back-alley in Budapest.
What is the source of the information that $1.3 million were spent on attorney fees to defend the "Birther" lawsuits? WND?
I recommend reading this article.
Nothing is wrong. You need to read my question in the context that it was posted. I challenged dell's assertion that "[t]he child, on the other hand, could have been born in... Kenya, or a back-alley in Budapest."What part of that is wrong? HNL is a city, on the island of Oahu in he county of HNL.
The child, on the other hand, could have been born in Hawaii, Kenya, or a back-alley in Budapest.
Really? Then why does the Certificate of Live Birth state that the city of birth is Honolulu, the island of birth is Oahu and the county of birth Honolulu?
Let's see. You are citing a right wing "guest columnist" who in turn quotes from a study by the United States Justice Foundation.Maybe you ought to check this out:
In fact, a study from the United States Justice Foundation has released information showing that Obama has spent upwards of $950,000 in campaign funds with 11 law firms in 12 states for legal resources to block disclosure of any of his personal records. Gary Kreep of that foundation stated that the investigation is still going on and the final report will be provided to U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder. Holder has refused to comment.