Chip Munn said:
Could Siegel announce major layoffs, base and city closures, declare Force Majuere over the A320 overhaul issue, place EMB-170s on Boston, New York, and Washington Shuttle flights to match capacity with demand, agree memorandums of understanding to sell assets like slots or international routes? For example, could we see the “Pref Bid†and Reserve Time Balancing system improvements result in more pilot furloughs instead of staffing the reported 60 additional A320 family aircraft?
Chip, Chip Chip, why do you post inaccurate information to rile up the board?
The Airbus narrow body dispute does not fit force majuere, force majuere is something beyond the company's control, they CREATED the dispute, they CHOSE to fight the IAM in court, they CHOSE to park the planes.
So there is no way the company can envoke force majuere.
You should really do some research before you post, cause your posting of inaccurate information really dwindles the molecule of credibility you might have left.
And let me refresh the IAM's stance on Dealing with Dave.
The Concession Stand is Closed!
To All IAM Members at US Airways:
Dear Sisters and Brothers,
District 141 and 141-M Representatives today met with US Airways at the carrier’s headquarters in Arlington, VA.
CEO David Siegel again spoke about the need to reduce costs, due in part to increased competition from low-cost carriers such as Southwest Airlines and JetBlue. However, Siegel did not make any specific requests to the IAM. It appeared obvious that there is a lack of a strategic plan on the part of US Airways.
While we are willing to discuss plans to permit the carrier to remain a viable employer, the Machinists Union today informed US Airways that we will not enter into any discussions to change the terms of our collective bargaining agreements – the concession stand is closed!
Our members ratified significant cost reductions while the company was in bankruptcy, providing the carrier with the tools needed to return US Airways to profitability. If US Airways’ executives are incapable of successfully running this airline within the framework of our existing collective bargaining agreements, a more capable management team should be employed.
IAM members have made significant sacrifices to save US Airways. The fate of the airline now rests solely in the hands of David Siegel and his management team.
No further discussions are scheduled.
Sincerely and fraternally,
Scotty Ford
President and General Chairman
IAM District 141-M S.R.
Randy Canale
President and General Chairman
IAM District 141