av8orwife
Member
When is a good time to strike?
Usually a good time to strike is when there is a good possibility that the end result would be an economic gain for the party who went on strike.
It's a balancing act between labor and a Company, both in a sense need each other to be productive and healty. If you strike and have a healthy company one of two out comes are possible. 1. an agreement is quickly reached so no long term distruction occurs to either party, and there is a perceived gain. or 2. no agreement is reached and the company is able to continue and has the financial ability to do so, end result is the striking party is the looser.
I am not sure of all the details of past strikes, but from what I can remember, The strike at Catapiller did not result in a gain for the workers and the company went on to prosper... It did not have the result that the workers had wanted.
The strike at Eastern Airlines was to make a statement, not for economic gain. It did have an impact on the bankruptcy laws and so it ended up for the greater good or labor, but the employees lost their jobs. The company closed it does, but laws were changed to benefit labor groups in the future.
In the case of U. Well it's an understatement that you do not have a strong financally sound company. So the purpose of any strike at this point would be to silmpy close the it down. Like pulling the plug on life support.
I am sure the work force is pretty divided at this point. Those who want it saved at any cost and those who are ready to pull the plug.
Usually a good time to strike is when there is a good possibility that the end result would be an economic gain for the party who went on strike.
It's a balancing act between labor and a Company, both in a sense need each other to be productive and healty. If you strike and have a healthy company one of two out comes are possible. 1. an agreement is quickly reached so no long term distruction occurs to either party, and there is a perceived gain. or 2. no agreement is reached and the company is able to continue and has the financial ability to do so, end result is the striking party is the looser.
I am not sure of all the details of past strikes, but from what I can remember, The strike at Catapiller did not result in a gain for the workers and the company went on to prosper... It did not have the result that the workers had wanted.
The strike at Eastern Airlines was to make a statement, not for economic gain. It did have an impact on the bankruptcy laws and so it ended up for the greater good or labor, but the employees lost their jobs. The company closed it does, but laws were changed to benefit labor groups in the future.
In the case of U. Well it's an understatement that you do not have a strong financally sound company. So the purpose of any strike at this point would be to silmpy close the it down. Like pulling the plug on life support.
I am sure the work force is pretty divided at this point. Those who want it saved at any cost and those who are ready to pull the plug.