Actually, I'd like to revisit something underpants said earlier...and something that AH mentioned in a crew news recently.
It is acknowledged that USAPA has the ability to (re)negotiate any existing east or west agreement currently in place...to include the TA. The original issue being discussed with AH was the min fleet/block hours for the west.
I'd suggest that you guys out in desertville start making a few friends at USAPA...seems they hold the keys to your kingdom after all.
Souperfly,
USAPA holds the keys, but unfortunately they use them to lock the West behind doors.
Some out east say as a line holding 320 capt I am protected by DOH with C&Rs. Well here is the crux of the matter. I am far greater protected by my seniority on the NIC. USAPA's attempt to take away that seniority is a direct discrimination against me and my fellow West pilots, and it has been pointed out, a union has a duty not to discriminate against those it represents.
So, yes I agree USAPA can renegotiate contracts but they cannot do it to the detriment of a select group of their constituents.
The NIC was arbitrated by a third party panel, in compliance with the tenants of ALPA merger policy, and accepted by the company as being in compliance with the TA. It is the only combined seniority list that could be included in any joint contract, less the union is negligent in their DFR.
This was all pointed out to USAPA before the election. This is the gapping whole in their plan to unilateraly determine seniority for the company. Out West, until USAPA handed their DOH list in negotiations, we were still trying to figure out wether USAPA was serious or just trying to stall and remain in seperate ops. Well now we know.
USAPA campaigned on the promise of throwing out the NIC.
They originated in a van on the way back from Herndon, seeking a way to throw out the NIC.
Their original web site proclaimed they would right this wrong, i.e. throw out the NIC.
Their original CB&Ls listed institute a DOH seniority system ahead of promote safety.
Their lawyer said they could offer a cost neutral contract in exange for DOH, on video no less.
So, unless USAPA can explain to me, the West pilots, Judge Wake and a jury, how changing my seniority and putting me junior to every east pilot including furloughed at time of merger does not harm me, then they are negligent in their DFR. Perhaps they could point to their C&R's that grant any growth to the east, or better yet, guarantee that I could be furloughed before those who were furloughed at the time of the merger.