WorldTraveler
Corn Field
- Dec 5, 2003
- 21,709
- 10,662
- Banned
- #211
From the days of the Pan Am Shuttle, DL has been the dominant carrier on the LGA-BOS leg while US has been the dominant carrier on the LGA-DCA leg.
Average fares on the LGA-BOS segment are significantly higher than what B6 gets from JFK (or DL either).
The real issue is that DL could be carrying a lot more revenue if they allowed connections. Given that AA and UA both operate from the CTB, DL's appeal is that its flights are in a less chaotic terminal. US' Shuttle flights do not operate from the unique section of the terminal it once did.
As for LGA-ORD, as hard as it may be to believe, DL's local market revenue is about 2/3 of what UA gets and just under half of what AA gets. AA and UA carry a lot of connecting traffic beyond ORD that fills up their planes but which doesn't add local market revenue.
DL's load factor on the LGA-ORD is below AA and UA's by double digits but it is well within what other carriers get in key markets.
OTOH, the LGA to BOS/DCA Shuttles for both DL and US have very low load factors that can't be sustainable. Both carriers have got to be looking for some major strategy revisions.
I am sure that some people would view a move out of the MAT negatively. But I can't the convergence of DL's needs to improve its presence in the NE will coincide with AA's needs to consolidate its operations.
These kinds of things are exactly how carriers can work together to help each other out but these moves have to be seen as "we each give a little for us all to gain a whole lot more."
With the merger moving forward, there will be a lot of these kinds of deals that can work while still preserving a very competitive macrocompetitive environment.
Average fares on the LGA-BOS segment are significantly higher than what B6 gets from JFK (or DL either).
The real issue is that DL could be carrying a lot more revenue if they allowed connections. Given that AA and UA both operate from the CTB, DL's appeal is that its flights are in a less chaotic terminal. US' Shuttle flights do not operate from the unique section of the terminal it once did.
As for LGA-ORD, as hard as it may be to believe, DL's local market revenue is about 2/3 of what UA gets and just under half of what AA gets. AA and UA carry a lot of connecting traffic beyond ORD that fills up their planes but which doesn't add local market revenue.
DL's load factor on the LGA-ORD is below AA and UA's by double digits but it is well within what other carriers get in key markets.
OTOH, the LGA to BOS/DCA Shuttles for both DL and US have very low load factors that can't be sustainable. Both carriers have got to be looking for some major strategy revisions.
I am sure that some people would view a move out of the MAT negatively. But I can't the convergence of DL's needs to improve its presence in the NE will coincide with AA's needs to consolidate its operations.
These kinds of things are exactly how carriers can work together to help each other out but these moves have to be seen as "we each give a little for us all to gain a whole lot more."
With the merger moving forward, there will be a lot of these kinds of deals that can work while still preserving a very competitive macrocompetitive environment.