OldGuy@AA said:
I talked to Lombardo personally when he came to Tulsa. He saw my AMFA pin and told me "We need one union here and you need to get rid of that pin." I told him he and the TWU International needed to give me one good reason why I should lose the pin. He told me "We got one union here." A fork lift drove by just then and I asked him if we had one union why did forklift drivers and all the other stock clerks along with fleet service have superior benefits than AMTs? He looked at me for a few seconds and said nothing. Then his trained monkey Sean Doyle jumped in and offered to answer any questions I had. When I started asking them he said he would do it over email. When I emailed him he said he would rather do it over the phone. When I told him I wanted everything in writing so there could be no misrepresentation of either of our words he agreed so I emailed him the questions. One of them being why any union would agree to discriminate against one group by forcing inferior benefits on them such as unpaid sick time and less vacation. He did not answer one single question. This is the TWU International that Bob Owens is talking up. I wanted to know why the inferior benefits were allowed and what was being done to rectify it. At this point after not having paid sick time for well over 10 years, and the loss of yet another week of vacation, I feel the TWU has no intention of getting either for us ever again. I also think that maintaining 6 weeks of vacation for stores (along with the skill pay they got them and their continued 100% paid sick time) is a complete slap in the face to all AMTs. Mr. Lombardo is just another windbag who will do nothing for AMTs because he has no respect for us. Anyone who condones inferior benefits for any work group in the same union is not fit to hold office. His refusal to answer my questions prove that there is no plan to get us the basic benefits that stock clerks enjoy. He didn't even use the excuse that we would get everything back in the joint agreement. If any one of you on this board thinks for one second that the TWU (or IAM) will gain anything in joint negotiations you are completely out of touch. In the first place, AA will drag these negotiations out for several years. In the second place remember that the TWU got stock clerks skill pay when they couldn't get us full sick pay. I'm sorry and I know I have said this before and some of you are probably tired of it, but I and all AMTs deserve the same benefits as a stock clerk. Bob, I'm sorry but you are out to lunch on this one. The only way we AMTs have any chance to salvage anything from our careers is if we dump the TWU. Of course the IAM is no better and I point to their TA as proof. Why are they setting the bar at AA compensation when we are in a BK contract? We have one last chance to fix what is wrong and throw the TWU out. We cannot trust lip service from the likes of Harry Lombardo. We are not bus drivers so we do not matter to Harry Lombardo. Sean Doyle is a recipient of the Junior Mechanic Program that handed free A&P licenses to career fleet service clerks, cleaners and stock clerks instead of forcing AA to raise the pay for AMTs so they could hire them instead of all of them going to UA, US Air and Delta for the higher pay. This is the TWU and I am sick and tired of seeing them take care of everyone else except the AMTs. Get rid of them now. For me and a lot of others it is too late to save our careers but we have a chance to help the next generation of AMTs. I challenge anyone to email Sean Doyle and ask these questions and see the answers (or lack of) that you receive if you receive anything back at all. Sorry Bob but I must disagree with you on this one. The TWU is cancer to AMTs.
All the points you brought up about the shortcomings are valid, I've cited them time all and time again, its as if this Union hated mechanics. As if their goal was to say "Ok you wanted separate contracts, you got them", then make sure we did worse than anyone else, "you voted down the TA, so now we will string you along for two more years and never ask for a release". I have no doubt that Little and Videtich did hate the mechanics (or at least this mechanic), I believe they did everything they could to destroy our profession and give AA everything they wanted and punish us for voting down the concessionary deal they wanted us to accept. I admit that the new team has already made a few missteps, courting Tulsa and Fleet to the exclusion of Local 591 and 567 at the Convention was a big disappointment, but in politics sometimes letting it be known where you stand has a price, they knew Little wouldn't get our vote no matter what and they needed Fleet and Tulsa to clinch it. 591 and 567 pretty much were excluded from everything. Seeing Gary Yingst up on the podium was especially disappointing. I believe that they reacted defensively to the 565 lawsuit instead of attempting understand what drove it and make the corrections it called for. Their reaction towards both Dispatch and Sim-Tech negotiations was another error, they were unaware of the History. Dispatch and Sim Tech were part of the Joint negotiations where not only were they greatly outnumbered by Fleet presidents, but they were also subject to a weighted vote which in reality made them observers.
I don't know Harry well, only of what he did while in Philly, I believe I mentioned a long time back about how I asked Little to remove Videtich and put Harry in his place. I did that then because he was the only person in the International who ever took part in a strike, it would send a clear message to the company that this guy would pull the trigger. Samuelson I've known since 2009 and we have spoken on many occasions, I've watched as he restored a busted Local 100 into a powerful force in New York City. Most of our discussions were around local 100 and despite the fact I've known him for six years, because our situation is so utterly screwed up and complex, his understanding of our issues is limited, but I believe the visit this week opened their eyes that something is amiss at the AATD.
I didn't say you have to keep the TWU or forget the past or even forgive, I said that as long as they are here, if they are willing to take on the company and lead a fight against the company for our benefit we should be supportive, we should not let the company continue to believe that because we have no faith in the leadership of the union they can do whatever they like to us. We should not be more focused on fighting each other than the company.
Lets say the company decides to keep the matching funds and Lombardo calls for us to engage in actions to put pressure on the company to pay up, you are saying that we shouldn't?