mweiss said:In the end, though, it all sounds like "can't discredit the message, so let's discredit the messenger." Cordle's actions in the past don't change the facts at present, nor do they make his statements false.
[post="249898"][/post]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Michael,
I'm mostly live-and-let-live myself. Cordle may certainly have his say, and he could even be right.
But if he is a scab, that too, speaks volumes to me.
You know I have taken issue with unions myself. But if I were a dues paying member, and the call came to strike, I only have two choices. Strike. Or resign.