Dea Carte:
While your post was informative and detailed, I thought the over-riding generalization of the US-PS and US-PI mergers was these:
1. The things that PS and PI did that helped make them successful were thrown by the wayside to do things the USAir way.
2. The employee contracts ended up keeping the most expensive parts of each of the individual contracts.
If the HP-US deal goes thru, these are the primary mistakes which need to be avoided, IMO.
Proceedures will change at any company over time. I think part of what made mergers so difficult in the past is that there was a "cut-over day". On August 4, 1989 (I think that is the date) PI was PI and US was US. On August 5, 1989, US and PI were US. The advancement of code-sharing has shown us there is a new way to merge, the way AA and TW did... where TW flights apeared in res systems as AA*, operated by TWA LLC, similar to AAEagle... This allows the movement away from a single cutover date, and into a "phase-out" program, which allows for training etc, to eliminate a noticeable cutover date. AA-TW showed us that this is largely true. There seemed to be minimal service disruptions or noticable problems (labor considerations/subsequent furloughs aside) during that merger. It would seem to me that this would have set a new model going forward.
If nothing else, that should make this merger much smoother than many of those before it, should it occur.
While your post was informative and detailed, I thought the over-riding generalization of the US-PS and US-PI mergers was these:
1. The things that PS and PI did that helped make them successful were thrown by the wayside to do things the USAir way.
2. The employee contracts ended up keeping the most expensive parts of each of the individual contracts.
If the HP-US deal goes thru, these are the primary mistakes which need to be avoided, IMO.
Proceedures will change at any company over time. I think part of what made mergers so difficult in the past is that there was a "cut-over day". On August 4, 1989 (I think that is the date) PI was PI and US was US. On August 5, 1989, US and PI were US. The advancement of code-sharing has shown us there is a new way to merge, the way AA and TW did... where TW flights apeared in res systems as AA*, operated by TWA LLC, similar to AAEagle... This allows the movement away from a single cutover date, and into a "phase-out" program, which allows for training etc, to eliminate a noticeable cutover date. AA-TW showed us that this is largely true. There seemed to be minimal service disruptions or noticable problems (labor considerations/subsequent furloughs aside) during that merger. It would seem to me that this would have set a new model going forward.
If nothing else, that should make this merger much smoother than many of those before it, should it occur.