- Thread Starter
- Thread starter
- Banned
- #106
1. The members bombarded the company and the union after Siegel said he would abrogate the contract and hold his own vote, like I said the international made the decision to vote again, and if it was so bad, why did the members vote to ratify?
2. Is it too hard to understand that the members ratified the final offer the eliminated line utility? It is a democratic process and the MEMBERSHIP not leadership voted to ratify and not strike and accept the company's final offer, bottom line is the membership made the choice, that is how democracy works.
3. There are differences in the regulations that govern the air carriers operation.
4. You have not flown any passengers in several years. Compare Airlines that transport passengers, not cargo, two totally differant operations, and compare the IAM US CBA to HP, CO and UP and the IAM still has the superior scope langauge, and that is after two bankrupcies.
5. Joe Mantineo the former AGC retired from US in 1995, he is in his 60s, the person you are referring to is Joe Mantineo JR, HIS SON who is an AMT in PHL and not an IAM rep. (Don't let the facts get in your way!) You don't know jack! How does your foot taste?
6. A. I was there for the and related groups.
B. The CBA was abrogated by the judge since the IAM and the company could not agree, the IAM would not bring back a T/A that would eliminate 50% of th workers.
C. I was not employed by the IAM, the only people employed by the IAM who were on the Commitee were GCs Bill Frieberger and Tony Giammarco and Special Rep Tom Regan. The others were the Grievance Committe Chairs from CLT, PIT and PHL were there, all US employees,not IAM employees, paid by US not the IAM and appointed to the NC by the District and International. They are all regular employees working the line and base mtc Is that so hard to comprehend?
D. The AMTs at US east are not the lowest paid in the industry and at US east ask the GSE mechs about their pay, see they are treated as equals unlike your ibt represented mechs at HP.
Like I said you are more obsessed about me, sorry you are wrong once again, so don't let the facts get in your way.
You make this way to easy, how does it feel to be proven wrong time after time?
2. Is it too hard to understand that the members ratified the final offer the eliminated line utility? It is a democratic process and the MEMBERSHIP not leadership voted to ratify and not strike and accept the company's final offer, bottom line is the membership made the choice, that is how democracy works.
3. There are differences in the regulations that govern the air carriers operation.
4. You have not flown any passengers in several years. Compare Airlines that transport passengers, not cargo, two totally differant operations, and compare the IAM US CBA to HP, CO and UP and the IAM still has the superior scope langauge, and that is after two bankrupcies.
5. Joe Mantineo the former AGC retired from US in 1995, he is in his 60s, the person you are referring to is Joe Mantineo JR, HIS SON who is an AMT in PHL and not an IAM rep. (Don't let the facts get in your way!) You don't know jack! How does your foot taste?
6. A. I was there for the and related groups.
B. The CBA was abrogated by the judge since the IAM and the company could not agree, the IAM would not bring back a T/A that would eliminate 50% of th workers.
C. I was not employed by the IAM, the only people employed by the IAM who were on the Commitee were GCs Bill Frieberger and Tony Giammarco and Special Rep Tom Regan. The others were the Grievance Committe Chairs from CLT, PIT and PHL were there, all US employees,not IAM employees, paid by US not the IAM and appointed to the NC by the District and International. They are all regular employees working the line and base mtc Is that so hard to comprehend?
D. The AMTs at US east are not the lowest paid in the industry and at US east ask the GSE mechs about their pay, see they are treated as equals unlike your ibt represented mechs at HP.
Like I said you are more obsessed about me, sorry you are wrong once again, so don't let the facts get in your way.
You make this way to easy, how does it feel to be proven wrong time after time?
