SWA, FL FA agree on SENIORITY

The only thing you're "not doing" is comprehending what I've written here recently. That's okay though; from your writing, it's clear you enjoy playing the victim.
I will again agree to disagree, we are seeing two sides of a coin and I would say the same back, you are not comprehending what I am saying.

Dead horse, I am trying to breath, trying to breathe, LOL

O yea kev, I have yet to hear you apologize about your GROSS exaggeration and complete misquote! You know when you took "Wotkingaflights" comment - More bad employees and turned on him and asked why he thought EVERY FL employee was bad?

So I guess you are right, I am not understanding what you write because I don't understand how you took such liberties like that and don't have to take accountability, is that a perk when you get to SUPER DUPER poster level or when you have 4000 posts or more?
 
Oh, I understand what you post; why do you think I continue to call it out?

As for breathing, that shouldn't be anything you have to "try" to do, unless you're saying A] I'm getting under your skin (I shouldn't be), or B] That trying to gin up a deflection to make things about me and not what you've written is exhausting.

Lemme know which one it is.
 
Oh, I understand what you post; why do you think I continue to call it out?

As for breathing, that shouldn't be anything you have to "try" to do, unless you're saying A] I'm getting under your skin (I shouldn't be), or B] That trying to gin up a deflection to make things about me and not what you've written is exhausting.

Lemme know which one it is.
You don't have the intellect to get under my skin and the only one deflecting seems to be you, seeing as this is the 3rd or 4th time I have asked and yet to see any form of acknowledgement on how you can grossly exaggerate someones post. How is it u can't simply say you screwed up?
 
swamt,
I realize we are in the FA thread, but can you shed some light on the two rejected LOAs..... not sure esp. I understand what this means for the DFW people.

thanks... and any other updates on the mechanics progress is appreciated...
 
Ah, the personal attack; the sure sign reason has left the building. Fun!
[/quote

Not a personal attack at all u may be intelligent if fact... so why are u avoiding my question ...get your liberal hand caught in the : oops I screwed up jar??

kev dodging the question counter - now at 4
 
swamt,
I realize we are in the FA thread, but can you shed some light on the two rejected LOAs..... not sure esp. I understand what this means for the DFW people.

thanks... and any other updates on the mechanics progress is appreciated...

The DFW LOA, as its known, was to allow the Airtran mechanics stationed in DFW to bid into DAL with SWA mechanics as new hires until our merger became complete. Then they would bid with whatever seniority agreement we came up with. The Wright amendment forced Airtran to stop service into DFW after the aquisition thus displacing all Airtran employees stationed there. The company offer was to retro the 401K boost back to Jan 1, 2012 if the TA to
merge the 2 workgroups passed as well. It's a boost in 401K percentage company match from 7.6% (I believe) to 9.6% and the promise to open Denver MX within 90 days.. It might of passed if they would of not tied the TA to it.

As far as what the DFW guys have to do now, I don't know. They are spread throughout the AT system right now living out of suitcases, commuting back and forth to see their families. They fly SWA quite often so I'm sure someone has seen them.
 
thanks for clarifying... I guess I missed that the DEN maintenance and DFW issues were in the same LOA..... will be interesting to see where WN goes w/ this... this would seem to be a complication for them on several fronts.....
 
People working against the working class get no pass from me, V-day or not.
People who make major blunders trying to stir the pot and are to proud or juvenile to admit they are wrong or at least apologize to WORKINGaflight , get absolutley no pass from me ..not even if it was xmas
 
You're a little late to the party (or are conveniently ignoring it), as that has been explained already. Some of which was touched on in post 141, among others. If you want to keep grasping at straws, go right ahead. Anytime you'd like to comment more in depth about what I wrote in that same one would be fine too, though I'm sure it's easier for you to just keep running down this same tired track.

My only blunder was overestimating a couple of posters' comprehension abilites. My mistake.

Since you apparently require literal writing, here ya go: "You are assuming-or at least inferring- that the majority of these FL people will "suck." Since you only have first hand experience with a tiny fraction of them, what makes you assume that many- if not most- will underperform? How could you possibly know?"


Feel free to chime in on not only that, but what I wrote in 141. In the interest of consistentcy, make sure to include the terms "winning the lottery," "ungrateful," and "liberal."

Anything to keep the attention off of what you've previously written, I guess...
 

Latest posts

Back
Top