Bambi
Member
- Sep 17, 2005
- 88
- 0
Fox News article states: "NTSB spokeswoman Bridget Serchak said Sullenberger was free to give interviews if he wished".
Link here: http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,480691,00.html
Once again the unions butt into something they really don't need to be involved in...what...are they thinking they're goin to profit from this somehow? I don't know....but what really is the big deal for him to be interviewed, or the other crew members? I just get amazed sometimes at this type of thing and just feel they owe it to employees and the public to explain more clearly their postition. Did Doug state that Sully could not do interviews? I don't believe he has...but the Union? And exactly what is "interested party" status anyway? They aren't interested in anything unless they can make a profit...period!
Of course, since I'm not a pilot, I can't get into their union site further than a few pages to find any explanation to this...if there is one, it would be nice if someone put it on here.
Dougs letter on US News now is good.
Link here: http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,480691,00.html
Once again the unions butt into something they really don't need to be involved in...what...are they thinking they're goin to profit from this somehow? I don't know....but what really is the big deal for him to be interviewed, or the other crew members? I just get amazed sometimes at this type of thing and just feel they owe it to employees and the public to explain more clearly their postition. Did Doug state that Sully could not do interviews? I don't believe he has...but the Union? And exactly what is "interested party" status anyway? They aren't interested in anything unless they can make a profit...period!
Of course, since I'm not a pilot, I can't get into their union site further than a few pages to find any explanation to this...if there is one, it would be nice if someone put it on here.
Dougs letter on US News now is good.