ClueByFour
Veteran
- Aug 20, 2002
- 3,566
- 37
USA320Pilot said:In fact, in a press release on October 21, 2004 the company said "it is willing to work with the IAM to explore ways to bring future Airbus heavy maintenance work in-house."
See Story
Respectfully,
USA320Pilot
[post="168915"][/post]
After they (in all likelihood, in violation of the CBA and most certainly against what they actually said to the IAM-M and here on this very forum) already sent the work out of house. You never actually address this point while you are beating your drumbeat about "pain" and such, probably because it shoots your point in the six. I'll be delighted to read your thoughts on this matter.
Or, to put it another way, if the company decides to send all A320 flying to Mesa and subsequently issues a press release stating that "it is willing to bring future Airbus flying in-house," would you urge ALPA to negotiate concessions?
I don't think you would. Perhaps, in that light, you might see where the IAM is coming from.