The Glanzer Report

One more article...

Posted on Fri, Aug. 13, 2004
Report: Airline needs help now

Analysis prepared for pilots says if US Airways can't cut labor costs, it could close in 180-270 days or less

TED REED
Staff Writer

If it fails to secure labor cost reductions, US Airways will likely liquidate by spring, according to a new report prepared by consultants for the airline's pilots union.

"The company's business model is not sustainable," said the report by Glanzer & Co. LLC. "Either it adjusts its cost structure ... or the company will cease operating within 180 to 270 days, if that long."

The confidential report was distributed this week to US Airways' pilots; a copy was obtained by the Observer. Both the airline and the Air Line Pilots Association said they generally agreed with the dire conclusions of the report, though they declined to comment on specifics.

The company, which emerged from Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in March 2003, is extremely likely to return to bankruptcy court by mid-September, the report said.

US Airways, which has its largest hub in Charlotte, has been buffeted by high fuel costs and intense competition from low-fare carriers. Despite the previous bankruptcy reorganization, it has the airline industry's highest costs and has said it will lose money this year. The company has previously warned in securities filings that without cost cuts, it faces bankruptcy.

The pilots union retained consultant Glanzer to determine whether the company's demand for $295 million in annual concessions was warranted.

The report recommends that pilots, currently in negotiations with US Airways, generally provide the cost savings that the airline wants. The airline is seeking $1.5 billion in annual cost cuts, including $800 million from its unions.

The progress of talks with pilots, considered the most likely group to make a deal, has slowed. And there has been little or no movement in talks with other unions.

Even if there were a deal with pilots, a second bankruptcy filing should be expected in mid-September "as a result of various financial pressures," the report says. Chief among them is a $130 million payment due Sept. 15 to pension plans for flight attendants and mechanics. A Chapter 11 filing would allow the airline to conserve cash.

But harsh financial pressures would continue.

High fuel prices mean the airline won't be able to meet the Sept. 30 cash flow requirement mandated by the federal Air Transportation Stabilization Board, the report says. That failure would trigger a default, giving the board the option to seek repayment.

The airline needs to cut costs in order to convince the board to continue to provide the loan guarantees, the report says. The board was created after the Sept. 11 terror attacks to help the beleaguered airline industry. It guaranteed private-sector loans to US Airways and demanded that the airline meet certain financial requirements.

US Airways had a cash balance of $975 million at the end of the second quarter. The board's guarantees cover about $720 million in US Airways' debt.

The airline also needs to cost cuts in order to retain the confidence of its other creditors, including General Electric Capital Corp., which has provided financing for regional jets, and American Express, which has an escrow account for credit card payments for unused tickets.

If the airline's financial outlook deteriorates, creditors will become increasingly eager to get their money back, the report says, unless they are "persuaded that the company is a viable enterprise." Were any single major creditor to seek repayment, others would follow, triggering a failure, the report says.

In a second bankruptcy, the airline could secure cost cuts from unions and possibly negotiate lower payments on some of its debt. But a bankruptcy contested by every one of the unions could lead the stabilization board to conclude that it should simply seek repayment, the report says.

The airline's most valuable assets are its gates and assigned flight times at congested Northeast airports, such as New York's La Guardia, the report says. But because other airlines could profit more from those assets, "the company may be worth more dead than alive to groups other than the employees."

The report also suggests that the airline could modify its survival plan to include either obtaining fewer new airplanes or obtaining older, cheaper airplanes. Fewer planes would mean fewer pilot jobs.

In a prepared statement, the pilot's union said that it concurs with the report's conclusion "that we quickly reach consensual agreements with all of our labor unions so that we achieve the necessary cost reductions."

Joe Tiberi, spokesman for the International Association of Machinists said late Thursday that he had not seen the report. He said the union, which represents mechanics and fleet service workers, remains unwilling to open its contract for concessionary talks, though it will suggest other cost-saving measures to the company.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ted Reed: (704) 358-5170; [email protected]
 
The Charlotte Observer wrote, "The report also suggests that the airline could modify its survival plan to include either obtaining fewer new airplanes or obtaining older, cheaper airplanes."

USA320Pilot commented: You first said on this website that US Airways was looking at used airplanes that could be added to the mainline fleet, mainly used B767-200s that could be obtained "on the cheap"?

Respectfully,

USA320Pilot
 
I wonder i wonder what IAM can say now? If they continue to spout their denial, I would begin to question their intergrity as an organization....
 
usfliboi said:
I wonder i wonder what IAM can say now? If they continue to spout their denial, I would begin to question their intergrity as an organization....
[post="168299"][/post]​


Hey fli

My sister is a technical writer and helped me put together a pretty awesome resume' tailored to f/a's. (I take it you are a f/a). PM me if you would like a copy. It's important that we have a resume' that highlights the many things we actually do. A great resume' alone has boost my confidence in looking for possible new careers.
 
"If they continue to spout their denial, I would begin to question their intergrity as an organization.... "

If you're going to be a shill, you should have at least posted under a different user name; this way, it would've at least taken a few exchanges of arguments/ripostes to shoot holes through your credibility and defense of your arguments...as opposed to just dismissing them out of hand.
 
The report above shows that the pension liability is $130 million, who EXAGGERATED that issue?


I can see this is another strategy for "doom and gloom", hurry-up-or-else retorhic all over again.

We all knew the pressure would start to build soon. We said this in early May. The PIT pres. wrote it out to her members, that the threats will start very soon.

Here we are, same tune, same station.
 
usfliboi said:
I wonder i wonder what IAM can say now? If they continue to spout their denial, I would begin to question their intergrity as an organization....
[post="168299"][/post]​
There is no denial, we know what the outcome probably will be. The point is the majority of us would rather not work for less wages and benefits on undesirable shifts and days off for the rest of our careers here. Its that simple. Its not the mechanic and related saleries or benefits that is putting this company out of business. I will reluctantly waste my time giving you one small example of pure company waste. A maintenance director position was vacated a couple of months ago. In the interim a track manger filled the position while they were looking to fill the position. The track manager was a front runner for the job, so Usairways hired a new manager to fill his position. The original track manager didn't get the director's job. But instead his title was changed to a floor manager while the new hire manager is still employed. So basically no additional work or workers were added to the dept. but another $80,000 to $100,000 a year salary was added to the maintenance dept. with no productivity increase. How many other depts throughout this company does this happen at also?? You probably don't care because of your tunnel vision. This is one small example why we will not voluntarily give again. Its just that simple guys. If my unions actions by not reopening the contract shuts us down, I can accept that and move on with dignity and respect for myself and my coworkers.
 
No matter if we had ALL proposals in hand....the members all would have to ratify,

and I can't see that happening.

BK it is. We will engage there.
 
PITBull:

PITBUll said: "I can see this is another strategy for "doom and gloom", hurry-up-or-else retorhic all over again. We all knew the pressure would start to build soon. We said this in early May. The PIT pres. wrote it out to her members, that the threats will start very soon. Here we are, same tune, same station.

USA320Pilot cooemnts: PITBull, the difference is the Glanzer report is not the company making the claim, but instead labors advisor making the claim. The report substantiates management's opinion of the environment and ALPA funded the report to poke holes into management's TP, which did not occur. Moreover, this could be a powerful tool used by the company in bankruptcy court against any union who does not participate in the new business plan, as evidence and then argument that labor has been unreasonable during the potential S.1113/S.1114 hearing.

Respectfully,

USA320Pilot
 
USA320Pilot said:
PITBull:

PITBUll said: "I can see this is another strategy for "doom and gloom", hurry-up-or-else retorhic all over again. We all knew the pressure would start to build soon. We said this in early May. The PIT pres. wrote it out to her members, that the threats will start very soon. Here we are, same tune, same station.

USA320Pilot cooemnts: PITBull, the difference is the Glanzer report is not the company making the claim, but instead labors advisor making the claim. The report substantiates management's opinion of the environment and ALPA funded the report to poke holes into management's TP, which did not occur. Moreover, this could be a powerful tool used by the company in bankruptcy court against any union who does not participate in the new business plan, as evidence and then argument that labor has been unreasonable during the potential S.1113/S.1114 hearing.

Respectfully,

USA320Pilot
[post="168321"][/post]​
So your saying alpa paid for this report and now the company will use it against all of labor in bakruptcy court. Man you guys are awesome, thanks for the help. :down:
 
Would someone post the entire Glanzer report for all employees to see? We're all in the same boat!

If ALPA distributed it to all pilots, and apparently to the press, then it is no longer confidential in any meaningful sense.

This may be the only union-side financial report, so it's applicable to all employees ...
 
I can buy that PHX is more expensive then ABE and maybe the same as CLT and PIT, but the problem of the whole east coast from BOS to Northern VA remains. Unless you are in management or a pilot, HP wages will likely be unliveable.

HELLO IN THERE! HP FA.
And just where do YOUR America West Gate agents/Check-in/Ramp agents from LGA PHL BOS EWR ATL ORD JFK IAD DCA MIA YYZ......... LIVE??????????? And your forgetting CREW MEMBERS commute. ALOT do NOT live in base!
 
to much time to quit said:
USA320Pilot said:
PITBull:

PITBUll said: "I can see this is another strategy for "doom and gloom", hurry-up-or-else retorhic all over again. We all knew the pressure would start to build soon. We said this in early May. The PIT pres. wrote it out to her members, that the threats will start very soon. Here we are, same tune, same station.

USA320Pilot cooemnts: PITBull, the difference is the Glanzer report is not the company making the claim, but instead labors advisor making the claim. The report substantiates management's opinion of the environment and ALPA funded the report to poke holes into management's TP, which did not occur. Moreover, this could be a powerful tool used by the company in bankruptcy court against any union who does not participate in the new business plan, as evidence and then argument that labor has been unreasonable during the potential S.1113/S.1114 hearing.

Respectfully,

USA320Pilot
[post="168321"][/post]​
So your saying alpa paid for this report and now the company will use it against all of labor in bakruptcy court. Man you guys are awesome, thanks for the help. :down:
[post="168326"][/post]​

UAS320Pilot is right on this one. The company could use the report as evidence of need, and perhaps any other union's failure to negotiate without good cause. An opposing union would then be left to poke holes in whatever facts or assumptions are relied upon in the report. Welcome to my world of fast-paced and adversarial litigation. :rolleyes:
 
AirLocker said:
Would someone post the entire Glanzer report for all employees to see? We're all in the same boat!

If ALPA distributed it to all pilots, and apparently to the press, then it is no longer confidential in any meaningful sense.

This may be the only union-side financial report, so it's applicable to all employees ...
[post="168329"][/post]​

I personally find little in the report as it was released to the pilot membership that is "confidential". There are so many "[text deleted]'s" in there that nothing in the way of dollars and cents remains. What's left is very broad-brush.

Since it's already in the media's hands for them to place their slant on it, with others using the media report to slant things to their liking, I agree it should be released to the employees. Besides, ALPA may have hired the author but the company is paying his bill, so every employee should have the right to see what their possible concessions paid for.

Jim
 
usfliboi said:
I wonder i wonder what IAM can say now? If they continue to spout their denial, I would begin to question their intergrity as an organization....
[post="168299"][/post]​

Joe Tiberi, spokesman for the International Association of Machinists said late Thursday that he had not seen the report. He said the union, which represents mechanics and fleet service workers, remains unwilling to open its contract for concessionary talks, though it will suggest other cost-saving measures to the company.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top