Revoking Your Iam Membership

The IAM did not negotiate the keeping of 50 utility jobs, the offer the IAM gave to the company on 1/5/05 kept the big eight stations for line utility and the two bases.

The company rejected that offer and instead threw a final offer to the IAM which the membership voted on.

Your statement is an outright falsehood, what was voted on was a Final Offer, not a tentative agreement that was negotiated.

Funny how you have to make up phony things and can't stick to the facts.
 
700UW said:
The IAM did not negotiate the keeping of 50 utility jobs, the offer the IAM gave to the company on 1/5/05 kept the big eight stations for line utility and the two bases.

The company rejected that offer and instead threw a final offer to the IAM which the membership voted on.

Your statement is an outright falsehood, what was voted on was a Final Offer, not a tentative agreement that was negotiated.

Funny how you have to make up phony things and can't stick to the facts.
[post="250160"][/post]​

Oh and everyone believes your so called facts. The company also willingly put the heavy airbus work in pit. Theres no way that wasn't NEGOTIATED!! I guess you weren't even invited to the secret meetings that roach had behind closed doors with the company. I heard the iam payoff this time was even higher than the 1.5 million from the last time. How much steak and lobster did you eat?? ;)
 
DR.EVIL said:
We are fully aware of that, but it was designed that way by the so called union that mis represents us.
[post="250157"][/post]​
your union preprogrammed apathy and the like?
your union made it so the membership always has something else to do??
funny you say that.....i was over the hangar the other day licking frank's boots and the subject of how we are getting information out regarding remployment,financial aid,etc and so on to the member was brought up and that old apathetic bs popped up....
you know...union has seminar on all available to you (at the hall) and 15 people show up...then bombast the hangar office at a later date demanding to hear about what was presenteed at the hall...
when asked why they didn't attend to educate themselves on their unemployment/severance and how to deal with what lies ahead,the usual replies came up...you know...i didn't want to come in an hour early or i had to do lunch with the girlfriend....you know life issues.....
dude the memberships fu**ed up.... ;)
 
See there you go again, posting outright false information.

There was no negotiation on what plane gets overhauled where, please show me that article in the contract to backup your lies.

There was no payoff, there was a reibursement for expenses, just like every other union recieved.

There were no secret meetings with Roach and the company, and I guess I must have missed the day when steak and lobster were served.

Keep posing phony facts, because you know you are wrong and you are trying to deflect yourself being wrong with posting of false information.
 
700UW said:
The IAM did not negotiate the keeping of 50 utility jobs, the offer the IAM gave to the company on 1/5/05 kept the big eight stations for line utility and the two bases.

The company rejected that offer and instead threw a final offer to the IAM which the membership voted on.

Your statement is an outright falsehood, what was voted on was a Final Offer, not a tentative agreement that was negotiated.

Funny how you have to make up phony things and can't stick to the facts.
[post="250160"][/post]​

First off just because you the credentialed negotiator was at the table it doesn't mean you knew what was happening behind closed doors.

But even so it doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out that a last offer that included the complete elimination of the utility would have for sure drawn a "NO" recommendation from the IAM and since the last offer did include keeping utility the IAM wasn't stupid they knew it meant they could just sit back let the members vote on it washing their hands like Pontius Pilot knowing full well this meant there would be no chance the mechanics could get rid of the IAM representing them for years if it was voted in.
 
I believe 700 when he says the company bargained in bad faith. Case in point, another thread states that the res centers were negotiated with jobs being the final luring factor. But no sooner was the ink dry, and USAirways is trying to wriggle out of that committment as well!
I don't trust this bunch of festering thieves who call themselves management!
If everyone is tired of what 700 has to say, then put him on the ignore list, instead of waiting like a bunch of hungry dogs waiting to pounce on every word he types.
Our First Ammendment gives us the freedom of speech, this includes 700 as well!
So if he posts 1 or 3000 posts, it just doesn't matter. Life goes on, and its time that we do as well. Good Luck to all, and remember to hold on to your wallet, because Lakefield will be back for more! :huh:
 
700UW said:
I have plenty of schooling and training, this is a form about how to revoke your IAM membership, not my bio, and for anyone that knows me may ask me in person what schooling, classes, workshops and other things I have been trained for.

And you are a non-employee and a non-member, so what crude attempt at insults does not matter. just show your lack of credibility.
[post="250152"][/post]​

The only qualifications proven to be needed to be a part of the IAM negotiating team is the ability to turn your back on the workers, accept corporate greed to keep the dues flowing in, and most important of all change your positions when the IAM tells you to. Anyone remember 700's "Concession stand closed"????
 
700UW said:
I was not appointed to an IAM position, I am working for US Airways, not the IAM.

You really need to check your facts before you post wrong information, attacks and insults.
[post="250141"][/post]​
It seems the company has always taken care of its COMPANY/UNION YES MEN! :down: :down:
 
fatherof2 said:
I don't trust this bunch of festering thieves who call themselves management!
If everyone is tired of what 700 has to say, then put him on the ignore list, instead of waiting like a bunch of hungry dogs waiting to pounce on every word he types.
:
[post="250175"][/post]​

We know the company is scumbags to their workers, but we also know the lavman very rarely speaks the truth, then again we expect nothing less from an iam appointed negotiator, er I mean last offer writer, or whatever you want to call it. It would also be no fun no ignore him, I can feel his blood pressure rising from my control center!!! :up:
 
fatherof2 said:
  If everyone is tired of what 700 has to say, then put him on the ignore list, instead of waiting like a bunch of hungry dogs waiting to pounce on every word he types.
  Our First Ammendment gives us the freedom of speech, this includes 700 as well!
[post="250175"][/post]​

So what you are saying is if 700 posts, as is his right, a pack of hungry dogs that don't like his stance on the issues should just have him on their ignore and not post thier rebuttals as the First Amendment right of free speech applies only to 700 not a pack of hungry dogs? (actually a pack of hungry humans)

Oh ok that sounds fair... NOT
 
Everything I post is accurate, the only thing I have my word, I have backed up with facts.

Where is the facutal information to back up your lies?

See all of your posts are diversionary, no substance, just lies, attacks and insults.

My blood pressure is just fine, I just finding it amazing how posters have to insult and attack instead trying to stick to facts.

But I don't expect anything less from the malcontents who don't do a thing to help themselves or help others, it is easier for you to sit on your duff and sit behind a monitor and spew misinformation then to actually do anything to make things better.
 
700UW said:
Everything I post is accurate, the only thing I have my word, I have backed up with facts.

Where is the facutal information to back up your lies?

[post="250193"][/post]​
Talk about lies?

Then where are the facts that you were qualified to negotiate the membership down the drain? Where are the facts that a IAM proposal was given to the company?
 
Listen I have told IAM Members numerous times on how to view the offer.

Apparently you don't understand the differance between a Final Offer and a Tentative Agreement.

Please show me where I or any other member negotiated the membership down the drain?

See you are one person who can't be pleased, you are not an US employee nor an IAM member so you are just mad that you can't see the proposal because it won't be posted online.

Yet other posters on this board have verified it exsists.

But like I said, it is easier for you and others to be a sideline QB and think you know exactly what happened, but once again you do not know what transpired.

Keep up the good work on spreading misinformation, attacking and insulting people who actually care and tried to make a differance.

Have a nice life.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top