La Li Lu Le Lo
Veteran
- May 29, 2010
- 7,414
- 2,649
I will let Dog know you are after his job. You just need a bit more practice.
President Trump
- Thread starter signals
- Start date
Kev3188
Veteran
Should I take that as a "yes," then?
Dog Wonder
Veteran
He is always mad.
Dog Wonder
Veteran
We are after your job, after the federal assistance kicks in.
Dog Wonder
Veteran
If we had no guns, no one would be murdered by guns, wouldn't make sense to you though.
KCFlyer
Veteran
- Aug 20, 2002
- 11,294
- 1,427
No, I don't know any. I DO know some who spent substantial sums of time and money to try to adopt a kid that could have been aborted instead.
La Li Lu Le Lo
Veteran
- May 29, 2010
- 7,414
- 2,649
Those are epidemic numbers. However the PC crowd has chosen to ignore it for the sake of leftist "social engineering".
If gays really valued marriage as a whole they would not have such high infection rates. So I say again, gay marriage was never about marriage at all, it was an attempt at social engineering by the left.
Did you even watch the video?
Will you even admit that mass immigration, specifically Muslim immigration, has caused major problems in the EU?
Again what makes you think bringing Muslim "refugees" here will turn out any different?
This situation is no different than the HIV epidemic among gays. The left is ignoring the issue for the sake of "social engineering". They are going to push their multiculturalism agenda regardless of the consequences to the American citizens.
La Li Lu Le Lo
Veteran
- May 29, 2010
- 7,414
- 2,649
I thought you lefties were all for abortion.
La Li Lu Le Lo
Veteran
- May 29, 2010
- 7,414
- 2,649
One day you are defending the gays the next you are using homosexuality in an attempt to insult me.
How very LEFT of you.
KCFlyer
Veteran
- Aug 20, 2002
- 11,294
- 1,427
No...you didn't think anything, but you ASSUMED a lot. Here are some common assumptions
ASSUMPTION: All liberals support abortion as a form of birth control
FACT: Most don't. But we don't believe that the government has a right to dictate what a woman can do with her body. And we understand that in many cases, abortion is the only solution - even if the person really really wanted that baby. This comes from experience - so it's the old "walk a mile in my shoes. When you get the government setting limits on what you can and cannot do with your own body - it gets really sticky. So the best idea is to keep government out of one's personal life.
ASSUMPTION: Liberals hate Christians
FACT: Many liberals ARE Christians. We just recognize that many Christian sects do not feel that OTHER Christian sects are Christian. Many Protestants, particularly the politically active evangelicals do not view Catholics or Mormons as Christian. So we just believe that if we can't agree what constitutes "Christian", maybe we shouldn't try to enact church law as the law of the land
ASSUMPTION: Liberal want to ban guns.
FACT: Many liberals own guns. Some liberals DO want to ban every gun...most don't. Most feel that SOME regulation might be a good thing. Yeah...gun ownership is a right - just like free speech is a right. But we have laws on libel and slander, and you can't yell "fire" in crowded theater. Those are called "regulations", and the country seems to run well with them. I can't figure out why guns are so different.
ASSUMPTION: Liberals want to redistribute my wealth.
FACT: We want to provide a helping hand to those in need. If you think that Liberals don't get pissed off by people who abuse the system, you'd be wrong. But not all of them abuse they system as we have been led to believe by the "welfare surfer" on Hannity. We think a basic quality of life is necessary for a country to be "first world".
ASSUMPTION: Liberals hate the rich
FACT: Since a LOT of rich people are liberal, there must be a lot of self hate among the group.
Dog Wonder
Veteran
Why would comparing your life to your fantasy about gays be an insult.
Kev3188
Veteran
Exactly. Maybe fueling that victim complex makes the dissonance in his head a little less loud...
La Li Lu Le Lo
Veteran
- May 29, 2010
- 7,414
- 2,649
The government using tax dollars to pay for abortions is not keeping the government out of one's personal life. Paying for the consequences of your choices out of your own pocket is what keeps government out of your personal life.
My belief is tax dollars should not go toward negating personal consequences of behavior. If a woman chooses to have sex then she chooses the consequences of her actions. Period.
I don't see the left attacking Islam, Buddhism, Judaism, Wiccan, Satanism, Taoism, or Hinduism. I never see the left criticize those religions.
If you can't see the difference you need to look at what is going on in Germany. The government has committed treason against the citizens by allowing their culture to be decimated by Muslim "refugees". However the German government has little to fear from it's "well regulated" citizens. When it comes to protecting ones freedoms it is best to be on as even terms as possible.
Then why does the left resist welfare reform that would eliminate some of these parasites?
According to the Social Security Administration website as of October we have 14,085,000 Americans under the age of 65 drawing Social Security, Disability, or both.
https://www.ssa.gov/policy/docs/quickfacts/stat_snapshot/
Our fifth most populated state (Illinois) as of July 1st 2015 was estimated to have only 12,859,995 people.
http://www.census.gov/quickfacts/table/PST045215/17
Do you think it is appropriate to have more people on welfare and disability under the age of 65 than our fifth most populated state?
You have a lot of rich white liberals talking about income inequality, white racism, and white privilege.... yeah no self hate there.
La Li Lu Le Lo
Veteran
- May 29, 2010
- 7,414
- 2,649
Maybe you are an idiot making asinine comments for attention.
