That you continue to demonstrate a complete lack of ability to respond with a coherent argument emphasizes what I and others have said on thread. Thanks for the stereotype--now mix my drink.
What's the argument?
-PIT domicile likely to close
-Mainline presence nearly non-existent
-If base closure occurs, 350 F/As will be displaced like thier 2500 PIT co-workers previously were, and everyone else from any other closed base was. Flying will also go to other bases
-EMBFA thinks this is sad for them but cares as much/little as they do/did when others were in the situation
-EMBFA has nothing against the city of Pittsburgh, but like US Airways (and every other airline in the nation apparently), does not feel that sentiment, architecture, employee location, and hometown pride are the ingredients for a profitable hub
-EMBFA isn't afraid to share opinions, especially ones shared by a number of F/As, and fortunately is undeterred by keyboard insults leveled at internet alter ego.
Where's the argument? Come on now, have a swing at me if you think I insulted your city- which I didn't- you would know if I did- but don't excuse your bashing by calling it an argument. Define the argument or debate, trust me, I'll happily participate. Otherwise you're all simply upset because I'm not agreeing that PIT should be a major hub and crew base, and that the possible displacement of the remaining three hundred F/As is a major traumatic event for US Airways flight attendants.
