PlayTheOdds
Veteran
It was submitted this past Monday. It is a bad time to be leaving for it is about to get very interesting around here.
🌟 Exclusive Amazon Black Friday Deals 2024 🌟
Don’t miss out on the best deals of the season! Shop now 🎁
NW/DL Merger "Real Possibilty"
- Thread starter whaledriver
- Start date
QA4Jet-A
Veteran
So does this mean, your scab Hemorrhoid butt will be History, or will you still lurk? My suggestion would be to get that Plexiodomy. You'll feel way better and be able to have "in-sight" as to your next profession. May I suggest a proper job? Try "Junkyard Dog". That seems fitting. Paid for by the Politically Correct Airline Employees that "Give a Flip"!!!! Have a Nice Day......
jenny@nw
Veteran
sooooooooooooo is that similar to giving it a swift kick to push it back? (after the chocks are removed, of course.....)Unemployment
It's a special technique developed by a SUPERSCAB in order to get a jet off the gate :huh:
local 12 proud
Veteran
- Mar 5, 2004
- 4,265
- 4
Yea you could say that, I guess PTO was trying to make a name for himself and look like a hero of sorts. Nevermind the fact it was violation but heck who's counting over there at SCABTAIL anyway.
Good Lord you guys are lame. I can't believe you're still talking about this stupid lav thing. WHO CARES!!! IT'S NOT THAT BIG OF DEAL!!!. God forbid somebody do something outside the standard practice in order to get a plane out on time. Please explain to me how doing this was dangerous to passengers or to the aircraft? If there is no quantifiable risk in carrying a pale of "lav juice" through the plane, then this is a complete non-issue. Kudos to PTO for having a little creativity; something greatly lacking in a typical union workforce.
jenny@nw
Veteran
No Finman, that was Pan Am who lacked a little creativity with the most strict union workrules.
We here at Northwest do stretch an extra mile when the need is called upon. I always appreciated it when a mechanic or a pilot went the "extra mile" for everyone- however the picture of a person carrying around a bucket of something that is required for the comfort of one's bowl movement "nessecities" is reminecent of the farm work or something that belongs to the ozarks- Thus emphasizing the hillbilly-ness (or redneckness in some parts of this country) of a certain individual.
jenny@nw
Veteran
I agree that policies and procedures are generally there for good reasons. In this case, it's yet to be explained if carrying blue juice through the galley is explicitly prohibited, or if doing so is just a deviation from standard procedure. There is a huge distinction.
I thought this was about DAL and NWA merging?
jenny@nw
Veteran
similar. Airline going to the $h!ts.
OP
whaledriver
Advanced
- Jan 20, 2003
- 140
- 0
- Thread Starter
- Thread starter
- #26
local 12 proud
Veteran
- Mar 5, 2004
- 4,265
- 4
No 'finny ole boy' its you and pto who are lame, he clearly violated FAR part 43 when he signed off on servicing an UNserviceable lav. you better stick with crunching numbers and bending nails because when it comes to aviation maintenance and safety you have no clue, and apparently neither does your fond friend SUPERSCAB. anyone who falsifies a logbook are uses an unserviceable part is in clear violation and subject to stiff penalties. makes one wonder what else they have pencil whipped.
[Code of Federal Regulations]
[Title 14, Volume 1]
[Revised as of January 1, 2003]
From the U.S. Government Printing Office via GPO Access
[CITE: 14CFR43.12]
[Page 856]
TITLE 14--AERONAUTICS AND SPACE
CHAPTER I--FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
PART 43--MAINTENANCE, PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE, REBUILDING, AND ALTERATION--Table of Contents
Sec. 43.12 Maintenance records: Falsification, reproduction, or alteration.
(a) No person may make or cause to be made:
(1) Any fraudulent or intentionally false entry in any record or
report that is required to be made, kept, or used to show compliance
with any requirement under this part;
(2) Any reproduction, for fraudulent purpose, of any record or
report under this part; or
(3) Any alteration, for fraudulent purpose, of any record or report
under this part.
(B.) The commission by any person of an act prohibited under
paragraph (a) of this section is a basis for suspending or revoking the
applicable airman, operator, or production certificate, Technical
Standard Order Authorization, FAA-Parts Manufacturer Approval, or
Product and Process Specification issued by the Administrator and held
by that person.
[Amdt. 43-19, 43 FR 22639, May 25, 1978, as amended by Amdt. 43-23, 47
FR 41085, Sept. 16, 1982]
robbedagain
Veteran
- Oct 13, 2003
- 11,125
- 2,676
if DL andNW were to merge, what aircraft do they have that is compatible? besides the 757-200?
local 12 proud
Veteran
- Mar 5, 2004
- 4,265
- 4
jenny@nw
Veteran
simple inference of thought leads us to this point. Well we can still get back on the topic; I believe all the scabs will have NO JOB after the merger goes though.
