Overspeed
Veteran
- Jun 27, 2011
- 3,245
- 1,065
I did give a breakdown earlier in the thread.Of course he cant, he claims that all of the job loss at AA was due to downsizing of the fleet while all the job losses elsewhere was due to outsourcing and not downsizing of the industry. The fact is it was a combination of both at all carriers with the exception of SWa, Jet Blue and a few other non-legacy carriers. The fact is that AA continued to outsource as they laid off workers.
SWA has has steady headcount growth, with no layoffs ever, not prior to the IBT, not with the IBT and not with AMFA and he finds that contemptable, he feels that the workers of SWA should have been willing to slash their pay and benefits so they could hire more dues payers because as far as he is concerned maximizing the number of dues payer is more important than at least securing Market Rate pay and working condistions. The members exist to serve and enrich the Union elite instead of the Union existing to serve the members. He talks about Delles lump sum pension which is less than 2.5 years of Littles pay and a fraction of the pension that Little will likely collect. He is desperate to keep his position. One thing is certain, he doesnt have to work under the conditions he promotes.
There is one point that he has no credible counter to, and that is that any AA mechanic would be willing to trade places with a SWA mechanic but I doubt anyone could find a single mechanic at SWA who would trade places with an AA mechanic.That pretty much says it all.
Hey Overspeed whatever happened to the TWU drive at SWA? How many cards did you end up with, odds are the one card you did get was forged.
"When the union struck in August, its Northwest membership had dropped to 4,400 workers, down from 9,000, as a result of steep cutbacks by the airline."
"Northwest brought in temporary workers, whom it had trained, and relied on managers to do the mechanics' work when the strike began. It has since said that all of the strikers have been replaced by 880 mechanics, as well as workers from outside contractors."
"Out of those 880 workers, about 280 are strikers who crossed their union's picket lines, and another 200 are union members who had been laid off before the strike, according to the airline."
http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2005-12-31/business/0512310063_1_amfa-northwest-mechanics-aircraft-mechanics-fraternal-association
"The Aircraft Mechanics Fraternal Association (AMFA) won 63.5% of the vote, defeating the International Association of Machinists (IAM), both unions said Monday. A total of 8,239 votes cast over several days were tallied by the National Mediation Board. About 4,900 mechanics didn't vote."
"United becomes the largest of eight airlines whose mechanics have chosen the an independent craft union over traditional unions belonging to the AFL-CIO. AMFA now represents 20,000 aircraft mechanics at Alaska, ATA, Northwest, Southwest, United and three regional airlines."
http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/money/biztravel/2003-07-15-united_x.htm
And now AMFA just represents the M&R at SWA and AS which totals around 3,500. Note the article states that AMFA at one time represented AS, ATA, NWA, SWA, UA, and three regionals. Well? What happened brother? Where did they go? AMFA represented 9,000 alone at NWA according to the articles cited above.
And about your point regarding any AMT that would swap to work at SWA? DUH! We pretty much all would but then you are missing the most important point I made about scope. SWA and AA have about the same size fleet yet AMFA has about 2,000 where we have about 8,000. Under the AMFA scope language a huge number of AMTs would no longer be working even if they could swap. So if you think bringing in AMFA at AA will make things just like SWA then you only need to look at those over 15,000 who had their jobs lost due to poor representation and outsourcing.