Management Raises

bluetoad,

People are bailing from every position and they all can be replaced. There is not one person in management that can not be replaced.
 
People are bailing from every position and they all can be replaced. There is not one person in management that can not be replaced.

Pitguy

The fact you placed the word management in the context that anyone can be replaced is the double standard. If better and cheaper can be found in mgmt, why not for labor as well. Mmgt positions are often fired or eliminated because of performance, or even merely a premise of cut staff positions to make the numbers. Not the way in unions.
 
PITbull said:
Answer: Jerry Glass needs to change his hard stance against employees. Stop protecting his department "crazies", that he doesn't like to over ride them when they are blatantly WRONG. Its embarrassing.

Seems the shoe is on the other foot for a change here huh?

And tell him to please Listen first, before his mouth starts moving. He always convinces himself that he is right and never listens to the other side. Take the employees side even once in awhile. Train his department to discern what "mitigating circumstances" means!

Hmmmm...seems like this is a classic case of the pot calling out the kettle??

And he needs to apologize to the AFA PIT President for a recent event. Only then will the feeling of distain start to desipate for all of management including the CEO. There can be no forward movement on no "going forward plan" with this type of animosity between Labor relations and the employees. In my mind's eye, his arrogance and attitude is the biggest obsticle at U.

Maybe he could take a chapter from the AFA PIT Presidents book on dealing with others. Use the example of how she stood up to Dr. Bronner in CLT to let her true colors shine through. What a classic example of how to deal effectively with people. Seems like the two of them may even run in the same circles.
 
Or maybe its the PIT AFA's foolheartedness that seems to cause issues. If the PIT AFA wants to be a rabbid dog in heat and call names, don't expect much in return.
 
ITRADE said:
Or maybe its the PIT AFA's foolheartedness that seems to cause issues. If the PIT AFA wants to be a rabbid dog in heat and call names, don't expect much in return.


Amen Brotha!! :p
 
openview said:
Pitguy

The fact you placed the word management in the context that anyone can be replaced is the double standard. If better and cheaper can be found in mgmt, why not for labor as well. Mmgt positions are often fired or eliminated because of performance, or even merely a premise of cut staff positions to make the numbers. Not the way in unions.
Well then they should have replaced tons of management here instead of giving them bonuses. The talent I see for allot of the management here is pathetic. They drowned out the few good ones.


********************************************************************


I find it hilarious all the great minds of management here panic over Teddy Xidas. One woman is kicking all of their butts. I give her allot of credit though. She loves her job and does it well. She will do what is best for her members. One has to admit few if any could do her job better.

Whoop...............whoop.........panic mode..........hehe...........
 
Also why should some one who has been here 15 to 35 years care about a lousy 15 weeks of severance. That is a lousy package and no incentive. Severance should be doubled. Just another reason to keep voting "no".
 
Pitguy...I am with you. It does seem the company is at Panic Mode over Teddy Xidas. She is Dedicated, forthright, honest, hard working, realistic, Speaks Volumes for most of the F/A's. Probably gets less than 1/2 the sleep at night that Dave does. She CARES. :up:
 
Teddy Xidas does care about the employees, Dave Siegel does not. If you ask me the current onslaught of bad press against Ms. Xidas is definitely endorsed by CCY. I think Dave has made it personal, even took a slap at her during the webcast. Any logical person has to begin asking themselves, why all the fuss over Teddy Xidas? It's because Teddy calls it like she sees it and that drives Siegel crazy. Watch how this plays out. See how CCY will go to great lengths to discredit one LEC President. Isn't it odd how much time, resources, and effort will be wasted on this? This is a battle he will not win.
 
I do believe Teddy's heart is in the right place. I just think that sometimes it's better to be willing to play moderate even when your opposition is playing extremist. Polarizing behavior puts people on the defensive, which means you're already starting out ensuring that they're not going to listen.
 
I would think more like Ralph Nader. Believes in self and self-mantra but winds up f**king it up for everybody else. See, e.g., Florida 2000.
 
Ms Xidas, is a trade unionist at heart, she puts her members before herself and makes tremendous personal sacrifices to ensure her member's rights are upheld and the wrongs are righted.

The union movement needs more people like her, she cares and gives 110% for her members, something that people should commend her on, not chastise.
 
700UW said:
she cares and gives 110% for her members, something that people should commend her on, not chastise.
I don't recall chastising her for her caring and giving. The extent of my chastising, if that's what you wish to call it, is that I fear her methods are often counterproductive.

Brute force isn't the only way to get where you want to go.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top