Richard
Veteran
- Dec 15, 2005
- 2,084
- 2
OK I have edited this post to reflect a correction made by another member.
Let me rephrase. We do NOT want this thread headed into another rehashing of the ALPA East/West dispute. While another poster's comment below does mention the transition agreement, it is a direct response to information in the letter in question here, so I will concede that point.
Having said that, however, the original warning remains in effect for those looking to get into the dispute itself here. There are already threads for that this week.
Even a moderator can be wrong sometimes.....
Just keep on topic please.
Thank you.
Let me rephrase. We do NOT want this thread headed into another rehashing of the ALPA East/West dispute. While another poster's comment below does mention the transition agreement, it is a direct response to information in the letter in question here, so I will concede that point.
Having said that, however, the original warning remains in effect for those looking to get into the dispute itself here. There are already threads for that this week.
Even a moderator can be wrong sometimes.....
Just keep on topic please.
Thank you.