JCBA Negotiations and updates for AA Fleet

Status
Not open for further replies.
Weez I think we would all chip in and give $6,500 if you'll just drop it. Tell me what the big surprise in ORD is


I'm not dropping anything and it's not my call to drop. And again thankfully the people in authority aren't planning to drop it either.

And I have no clue about ORD.
 
Last edited:
I wrote once for you off the top of my head and it took only a short period of time to devise language that would have been sufficient for a contingency where the Company was not "successful" in discontinuing the Retiree Medical program.
This is why I laugh when WeAAsles says someone else has an EGO.

WeAAsles I guess you are just smarter than the rest of us.

I mean so few people can devise language off the top of their heads in such a short time after the fact as you.

Feel free to keep reading the previous over and over until you get it.
 
IMG_3022.PNG
Nice improvement to the ignore feature.
 
This is why I laugh when WeAAsles says someone else has an EGO.

WeAAsles I guess you are just smarter than the rest of us.

I mean so few people can devise language off the top of their heads in such a short time after the fact as you.

Feel free to keep reading the previous over and over until you get it.
Bob and Weez what about if I do this
 
As well they should. They put in the time, effort and student loan debt to earn those advanced degrees didn't they.

What about public sector workers with rich CBAs and pensions in states like CA, MA, and NY? A California public sector worker can retire at age 40 today and still collect a full pension. Sure they don't get to fly on a space available basis on flights with seats paying customers didn't want to buy but that rich pension could afford one the ability to work another career and buy all the positive space travel their heart desires. Why didn't you work for NYC waste division? Their unions have clout especially locally unlike the IAM/TWU/IAM+TWU A$$ossciation.

Josh
 
I do want Ograc to know I am serious about Scope. I realize it is very important even to the hubs. As we all know most displaced workers do not quit, they go to the hubs.

Understood gulfcoast1. Not protecting the current work covered in outline stations and the hubs is counterproductive in the long run. The next time at the table you represent a smaller number of the overall workforce. A loss of leverage. The protection of current work is critical. Why do you think the company, even with the record profits, continues to attack Scope language. Hard to put a price tag on what the company stands to gain if they can continue to erode Scope language. Displaced workers to the hubs is just the tip of the iceberg.
 
What about public sector workers with rich CBAs and pensions in states like CA, MA, and NY? A California public sector worker can retire at age 40 today and still collect a full pension. Sure they don't get to fly on a space available basis on flights with seats paying customers didn't want to buy but that rich pension could afford one the ability to work another career and buy all the positive space travel their heart desires. Why didn't you work for NYC waste division? Their unions have clout especially locally unlike the IAM/TWU/IAM+TWU A$$ossciation.

Josh


Never took the NYC Sanitation test and didn't have a friend named Vinnie Boombots either.

Besides maybe you don't know how hard those jobs are to get. Like being struck by lightning in a cloudless sky,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,twice.
 
Update
2. Scope is nowhere close to settled. DL 43 stations, LAA/LUS 40 but not settled. Outsourcing, as the company stated, is still on the table. The company mentioned deicing and catering, there is more on their list that they did NOT mention.
P. Rez
I'm still not understanding why you will not divulge what other jobs were on the table that AA did not mention. I might not be part of the catering crew and I might not deice, but what you will not let the members know might be my job.It makes no sense to stay silent. The company is the only one that can give details??
 
I'm still not understanding why you will not divulge what other jobs were on the table that AA did not mention. I might not be part of the catering crew and I might not deice, but what you will not let the members know might be my job.It makes no sense to stay silent. The company is the only one that can give details??
AANOTOK would you be willing to go another year or two to save jobs? like you said one of them might be yours
 
Albert, not sure if that's a loaded question or not. But I'm 100% behind no outsourcing, none. I don't care if the jobs are absorbed in other work area's, which I don't believe would be permanent, I don't want one job that either the IAM or TWU currently do to be taken away. So the simple answer to your question is yes, I will wait.
Now, the comment you replied to was more related to the lack of info on why we cannot be told what they are after, do you not have any issue with that, even if it's yours. Neither you or I will be out of a job regardless, I just want the Association to stop letting AA drive the bus and give me a few more details...
 
I will say this though, reading through Jetnet comments today in regards to the letter put out by AA, I was surprised we have a contributor to these forums who has no problem with outsourcing...tsk-tsk
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top