NYer
Veteran
- Jun 4, 2010
- 4,167
- 905
In Fleet:
BOS, DFW, ORD, STL on NC
DCA, SFO, MIA, JFK/LGA not on NC
LAX had a President on NC but he's now on International Staff
JCBA Negotiations and updates for AA Fleet
- Thread starter AANOTOK
- Start date
- Status
In Fleet:
BOS, DFW, ORD, STL on NC
DCA, SFO, MIA, JFK/LGA not on NC
LAX had a President on NC but he's now on International Staff
Tom Talbert 1888
Senior
- Banned
- #15,797
Where ever there is Fleet at LAA, they are represented by a local that has a President, might not be located in their city but they have a local that represents them.
Small stations LAS, MCO, SJU and TPA also nothing.
Why does STL get representation? TWA issues?
And we also have Steve M. for the LUS IAM side. BOS is well covered.
Josh
Tim Nelson
Veteran
Not sure about the TWU but I know you have a deal with the IAM. And it wasn't a coincidence that you took over for 700 is what I was told as well. Hey, it's your business but I think NYer deserves a bit more respect instead of you trying to sabotage your local and basically moderate this forum into the dumpster. Who knows, you may be the next Lehive? Lehive does do good work even though he is a goof.
conehead777
Veteran
- Dec 8, 2014
- 829
- 811
I do not have to reply I disagree with you all the time go to your safe place n700 you pos
NYer
Veteran
- Jun 4, 2010
- 4,167
- 905
LAS is part of the LAX Local
SJU is part of the JFK Local
TPA is part of the MIA Local
STL was voted in by the other Local Presidents when the original Negotiating Committee was put together.
Why does a small station with 150 clerks need its own rep on the NC? I thought TWA matters would all defer to Kasher and the SLI
Josh
Tom Talbert 1888
Senior
- Banned
- #15,803
Their own Fleet Presidents voted and chose whom to send to the NC.
And the Boeing DL 751 members solidly defeated the early contract opener (concessions) in late 2013 but the GL still intervened. What’s your point?
Josh
Tom Talbert 1888
Senior
- Banned
- #15,805
This is airline forums, and this thread is about Fleet Service Negotiations and Updates, what does this have to do with Boeing?
so whats your point?
NYer
Veteran
- Jun 4, 2010
- 4,167
- 905
.
Their seniority was decided by Kasher. Everything else is governed by the CBA.
As to why they're on the NC all I can tell you is that they were selected by the other Presidents when the choice was left up to them.
WeAAsles
Veteran
- Oct 20, 2007
- 23,544
- 5,263
In the beginning of the 12 pick MIA President at the time Tom Lee was not chosen along with NYC President Victor Gonzalez and ORD President Tim Marting.
As people dropped off or were elevated the President who replaces retiring President Tom Lee, President Sidney Jimenez eventually yes WAS asked (and declined) if he wanted to join the talks.
He declined more than likely due to both personal issues he has with people and the fact his participation in the talks would have been too late to matter anyway.
NYer will continue his spin anyway.
Refute/challenge your point and justification that just because local (or in the case of Boeing district) presidents/leadership vote a certain way doesn’t necessarily mean that’s how things play out. Didn’t DL 751 decline voting the virtually identical “offer” from Boeing and then the grand lodge did an unprecedented vote over a plant shutdown and during vacation in early January 2014?
Josh
So because STL is on the NC does it stand to reason they won’t be contracting that station out? Doesn’t article 1C enable such a move in 09/2018 based on current LAA mainline flight activity?
Josh
NYer
Veteran
- Jun 4, 2010
- 4,167
- 905
Unless there are changes to the current TWU language by September 12, 2018, STL is one of the stations that could face closure for TWU work.
- Status
Similar threads
- Locked
