- Aug 20, 2002
- 7,319
- 1,555
It was intended to be. like you700UW said:Is that the best you can do?
Weak and lame.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It was intended to be. like you700UW said:Is that the best you can do?
Weak and lame.
You are not educated, you are indoctrinated....700UW said:You could never be so knowledgeable, and educated.
And very knowledgeable too IMO. Just a little rude at times man.700UW said:Nope im educated
In fairness a little bit of both. Me too though.Overspeed said:Is it rudeness or arrogance?
You would know all about arrogance.Overspeed said:Is it rudeness or arrogance?
I hate to say it Whoop, but, don't be surprised when the teamsters/ibt get the Teamcare and VEBA forced into the contract with a deal done behind closed doors just like they did in a little hotel room and made changes to the contract at SWA. And yes it is fact and proven that this was done as well as admitted to by some in the teamsters nego team. The teamsters should not have even brought this contract to a vote, but, now that they did, they better get certain items out of the offer and increases in other areas to get a good contract. Let's all see if the teamsters will listen to the membership.whoop whoop said:OK people, let me intervene for just a minute on UAL.
There was nothing forcing the IBT to bring this garbage back to the membership! Call it what you will, last and final or a TA, the IBT brought it back to shove their teamster medical plan ( Teamcare ) and this bull prefund VEBA that you AA guys just got robbed out of down our throats.
Even though the entire contract was concessionary and not up to par for all that we gave up, the overwhelming majority had more of an issue over teamcare and the VEBA than anything else.
The 93% NO was just as much for the IBT as it was for UAL.
Thank you for confirming whoop:whoop whoop said:OK people, let me intervene for just a minute on UAL.
There was nothing forcing the IBT to bring this garbage back to the membership! Call it what you will, last and final or a TA, the IBT brought it back to shove their teamster medical plan ( Teamcare ) and this bull prefund VEBA that you AA guys just got robbed out of down our throats.
Even though the entire contract was concessionary and not up to par for all that we gave up, the overwhelming majority had more of an issue over teamcare and the VEBA than anything else.
The 93% NO was just as much for the IBT as it was for UAL.
Read through the "comments"whoop whoop said:OK people, let me intervene for just a minute on UAL.
There was nothing forcing the IBT to bring this garbage back to the membership! Call it what you will, last and final or a TA, the IBT brought it back to shove their teamster medical plan ( Teamcare ) and this bull prefund VEBA that you AA guys just got robbed out of down our throats.
Even though the entire contract was concessionary and not up to par for all that we gave up, the overwhelming majority had more of an issue over teamcare and the VEBA than anything else.
The 93% NO was just as much for the IBT as it was for UAL.
swamt said:I hate to say it Whoop, but, don't be surprised when the teamsters/ibt get the Teamcare and VEBA forced into the contract with a deal done behind closed doors just like they did in a little hotel room and made changes to the contract at SWA. And yes it is fact and proven that this was done as well as admitted to by some in the teamsters nego team. The teamsters should not have even brought this contract to a vote, but, now that they did, they better get certain items out of the offer and increases in other areas to get a good contract. Let's all see if the teamsters will listen to the membership.
Traymark said:Thank you for confirming whoop:
Union Hacks is entirely accurate in this case.
This point needs to be made because we are facing potentially the same thing right here at AA with the IAM in control of the JCBA .
Right now is when our union leadership needs to hear from the membership as they are at the table.
They need to know, we won't accept the IAMNPF without an opt out for anyone that wants to instead go with a 401k with a contribution/match in line with at least what the FA's got.