Charlie_Tuna
Veteran
- Sep 29, 2005
- 661
- 0
There is no doubt the union would love to get more bodies back to increase their payroll, I'm no fan of the IAM but they really don't have anything to do with setting head count levels, contractually I don't think there is much the company can do to get rid of any more mechanics they can't get people to come back or hire them as it stands now, could be the IAM wants you to beleive that if they don't negotiate 1000 could hit the street so they save face who knows. The thing to remember here is the arbitration is no guarantee, so is it better to gamble the whole thing and lose or use it as a tool to get back some of what was lost, some will say we should be able to get back what was lost and be awarded the grievance and I don't disagree when the company continues to make money on the backs of labor the only people rewarded are the execs and thats not right who knows how this is going to play out but it should be intresting please feel free to respond and say what you think will happen!
Well if you are to believe that words out of Doug's mouth the change of control has always been on the table. The problem is what the union thinks it worth and what the company thinks its worth. According to Doug its worth little. So why not let the grievance/arbitration play out?
The 1000 number didn't come from the union side..but you never know never know what goes on behind closed doors and to think headcount doesn't come into play in negotiations is naive at best.