Hotline for HP and US Airways Mechanics

[awausairtech]

"mole" That is DellDude. :glare:
OR a Pig Farmer Back East. :mf_boff:

 

[delldude]

EXACTLY!!! Why would ANYONE show what they got BEFORE they are REQUIRED to. That will happen AFTER single carrier status is declared and that has NOT happened yet. More time to gather cards.......more time to "raid".......more time..........time is on the IBT's side.

Go look at at the other workgroups postings.......doesn't appear that the IAM is favored there either.

i sure hope you aren't posting on company time.....they got rules there kiddo...watch your donkey.

 

[700UW]

Like I said she does not have a clue how it works.

The ibt can file for an election anytime, they don't have to wait after a single carrier status ruling.

Cards are good for a one year time period.

It is apparent the ibt is short on cards otherwise they would have filed by now.

 

[awausairtech]

and Barbell Corp aquired America West and Barbell is a subsidary of US Airways Group, INC, but we have told you this time and time again.

Don't let the facts get in your way.

MR-7 did the iam give you this fact?
Do you have comprehension problems?

The Merger Agreement provides that, upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the Merger Agreement, Barbell Acquisition Corp. will merge with and into America West Holdings (the Merger), with America West Holdings continuing as a wholly owned subsidiary of US Airways Group.

 

[Charlie_Tuna]

Makers mark is right - inorder to have a mole you have to be hiding something and the teamsters have had and have always had an open door meeting. The IAM just does not know how to deal with open doors, availability to the leadership, and honest communication with the members. I can say for a fact that prior to the contract talks and the merger I knew who Andy Marshall was and did talk to him when ever an issue came up. He even answers and returns calls to the IAM membership. Airwoman can not even get the IAM to return an email. No moles or secrets here its all out in the open.

Can you say for a fact IBT has never and will never have secret or closed doors meetings with AWA and/or Usairways?

I'll answer for you. No, not you nor anyone else can. Money including dues talks BS walks no matter what union is in. So don't even try to use secret meetings as part of any type argument.

 

[makers mark]

Snoop around and ask. And no side letters of agreement without membership approval.

 

[Charlie_Tuna]

Snoop around and ask. And no side letters of agreement without membership approval.

Snooping around? Right.. Can you prove your claim that the side letters were not voted on with contract?

 

[Bird Doctor]

Snooping around? Right.. Can you prove your claim that the side letters were not voted on with contract?

Charlie
IAM contract voted on and went into effect Jan. 31,2005 but if you look at THIS LINK http://www.teamsterslocal104.org/Files/M_R...ft_9_07_05_.pdf
you well see changes made all the way up to SEP. 2005 almost 9 Month after the IAM voted. So you figure who aloud the changes to be made. Pinocchio and DUDE will tell you it was the judge. Think for yourself

**Moderators Note: you were warned earlier to quit the name calling**

 

[Charlie_Tuna]

Charlie
IAM contract voted on and went into effect Jan. 31,2005 but if you look at THIS LINK http://www.teamsterslocal104.org/Files/M_R...ft_9_07_05_.pdf
you well see changes made all the way up to SEP. 2005 almost 9 Month after the IAM voted. So you figure who aloud the changes to be made. Pinocchio and DUDE will tell you it was the judge. Think for yourself

From what I understand dates have to do with date the language was agreed on. Not sure what that has to do with the side letters that others claim was never voted on which was my question.

 

[delldude]

Pinocchio and DUDE will tell you it was the judge. Think for yourself

my fine feathered friend.....no judge "threw out " our contract....it was abrogated per 1113 with the understanding that if the union membership and the company did not come to some type of terms for contract modification,he would be forced to impose the company's final offer.
once again you supply misinformation and bias....

 

[Bird Doctor]

my fine feathered friend.....no judge "threw out " our contract....it was abrogated per 1113 with the understanding that if the union membership and the company did not come to some type of terms for contract modification,he would be forced to impose the company's final offer.
once again you supply misinformation and bias....

DUDE
I did not say that the judge threw out anything I said that you would blame the judge and there were changes made after the contract was voted on and went into effect JAN 2005. Don't start twisting words like Pinocchio

Charlie
I think what you are looking for is ART 17 pgh P http://www.teamsterslocal104.org/Files/M_R...ft_9_07_05_.pdf

 

[Awa Contract]

Charlie you are wrong - the IBT does it all out in the open - I am on the committee and there is nothing decided about our contract behind our back - it is all done infront of us.

 

[Bird Doctor]

WOW IS IT TRUE??? check this out

http://www.usaviation.com/forums/index.php...ndpost&p=341565

Looks like one converted

delldude Yesterday, 11:31 PM Post #334
His Avatar on this day
Teamster LOGO
Veteran
Group: Registered Member
Posts: 4,822
Joined: 29-October 02
Member No.: 1,176

 

[700UW]

Guess you have no idea about sarcasm.

 

[Bird Doctor]

Guess you have no idea about sarcasm.

Pinocchio :boring: :bleh:

**Moderators Note: you were warned earlier to quit the name calling**