twuer said:
Hey Bob. . .you forgot these!!
*when Delle claimed he had people in the Braniff BK procedings. . .when actually the settlement documents show all the bargaining agents signatures but no amfa!!
*when amfa claims they want to debate and have actually had the oppurtunity at least 3 times. . . when actually on Sept 12, amfa kicked TWU professionals out of the meeting, on Jan 15, TWU opened the debate to ALL and amfa chose to stand in the hallway and not come in and on Jan 17, Delle refused to debate the membership at the Brady Theatre!!
The main point to my post was that amfa is not the all perfect union that you are claiming it is (and don't even say you and the other amfa supporters are not because you would be lying!!). You are quick to point out the TWU's faults but not amfa's. Why is that?? I can tell you why that is. . .because you are trying to get as many cards as you can signed for amfa and are not telling the whole story of amfa. It's called deception Bob.
I didnt forget. Where is the question?
You still have not shown me the same courtesy that I've shown you.
If you want a comment here;
As far as Branniff. I did not work there, but I know someone who did and that person was pleased with the representation she got there and has always voiced a pro-AMFA opinion. If what you say is true, then why do ex-AMFA members from Branniff still rave about it? On the other hand I also work with many ex-Pan Am workers who all, to a man, say that the TWU sucks and they all want AMFA.
I saw the video on the Sept 12 meeting. The room was crowded with people standing in the back. They said that they only wanted those from the affected title groups there as it was an informational meeting. I saw and recognized some of those there including Art Luby and the Zebco lady. I saw nothing unreasonable about the request, I saw them address every question, some obviuosly written by someone other than the person reading it, due to their difficulty reading it, in a professional manner. As I understand it,the meeting was promoted as an informational meeting for potential members, not a debate between Delle and Art Luby or the Zebcxo lady. Since many of those brought by the TWU were not potential members what was their reason for being there other than to disturb the meeting?
My understanding of the Jan 15 "debate" was that the panel was only open to associate AMFA members, employees of AA. While the TWU panel was to be made up of TWU officers. As such, its absurd to think that they could address specific questions if they related to what was happening at NWA,Alaska, UAL, SWA or any other carrier any more than one of our Local Presidents could answer specific details about SWA F/A negotiations, the Vegas Card dealers contract, or TWU Local 234's lawsuit against the International.
As far as Jan 17, the TWU made it known that they were declining the offer to debate. I was not there so I can not make any further comment on that.
Once again you do me a disservice, putting words in my mouth. Its bad enough how you childishly complain when every single point that you make is not addressed while you completely avoid sticky topics altogether but dont say that I've claimed something when I have not. In fact I've stated numerous times that AMFA is not perfect, and for a coward such as yourself who hides behind an alias to insist that if I deny this it makes me a liar is even more hypicritical.
Deception is claiming that the TWU got everyone their jobs back in 1995, when in fact it was the recovering economy.
Deception is sending out a biased "survey" then using that as a basis to sell a six year concessionary contract.
Deception is pushing through a six year concessionary contract while claiming that we dont have to worry because we have a "Me too" clause with the pilots.
Deception is saying "I have to use the restroom" then slipping out a back door to avoid the members questions.
You dont have to explain to me what deception is. You forget that I've been a TWU member for over 17 years. I've been the victim of deception for over 17 years. Have you ever asked me what the faults are of AMFA? NO. Do you post what we all know are the faults of the TWU, or do you lie and twist the truth? You claim that I should post AMFA's faults, well I'm sure that at one time or another I have. Are you willing to do the same about the TWU? You wont even use your real name! Do you know what an alias is? Its a deception. Its no small coincidence either that every single TWU supporter on the forum, despite the fact that they are the body in control and do not have to worry about reprisals from the company/union, choose to post under an alias. None of you have enough conviction to stand behind a word you write. You have some nerve making such accusations about me!