JFK Fleet Service
Veteran
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-11-20/american-airlines-mulls-headquarters-move-one-year-after-merger.html
I hear Tom Horton chuckling in the distance.
I hear Tom Horton chuckling in the distance.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Who cares? DP is just shaking down DFW for $$$$.UPNAWAY said:From a practicle standpoint what might be the most likely "areas outside of Ft Worth"?
Have to agree that being in a city probably makes for a better run company. The beginning of the end for Union Carbide was when they decided to move from Park Avenue to Danbury CT. They lost a lot of talent that didn't own cars and didn't want to leave the city. They never recovered and were eventually bought by DOW. Why did they move? Because Danbury was closer to where most of the executives lived. Too busy looking at the Deer running around in the woods instead of managing the business.eolesen said:There's no shaking down to do at DFW... But, they could quite easily move the offices to Dallas, Las Colinas (Irving) or to Arlington, Grand Prairie, or Southlake. I know there were detailed discussions about 10-12 years ago on whether or not to move to downtown Dallas. The thought at the time was to have more of a voice on Love Field...
Logistically, it makes little difference whether or not the HDQ is located next to the airport or not. TW, CO, UA, and B6 seemed to managed well enough by having off-airport offices.
DL, NW, WN, AA and AS have/were always been next to the airport property, if not on-airport.
Internationally, KL, JL, MX, AM, DJ, VA and NH were all downtown headquarters complexes. CZ, MU, CX, QF, JJ, SR, and AV were/are at the airport.
I've got a lot of friends at UA who were impacted by the move from being out in the suburbs to being downtown Chicago. Four years ago, they hated the idea of having to take the train into the city. Fast forward to today, and they love it. It's opened up the ability for a whole different subset of employees to be recruited, mainly folks who don't own cars... That's a bigger issue in blue states than in Texas, but from personal experience, being able to take the train to/from work and use that downtime however I want to beats being stuck behind the wheel on 360, 183 or 121, hands down...
Why do they need space? With the synergies they will be cutting heads.UPNAWAY said:No there is a space issue which is at least partially why this even being discussed. There is virtually no ongoing moves now from Tempe due to no space. When the new SOC opens they will move people there (to the old one), but that will not even cover it all.
Didn't AA used to have those buildings across the street from HDQ?eolesen said:It would be more than a stretch to try and cram everyone into HDQ1/HDQ2. It would be almost impossible to take what's in Tempe and move it into Centerport without adding another building.
Moving Envoy out only accounted for 25% of one floor, and perhaps a combined 25% of another floor out of the 5.5 habitable floors in HDQ1. There are 3.5 habitable floors in HDQ2. I forget just how many cubes are in each wing, but I'd guess it's close to 500 employees per floor, give or take.
Dallas, Irving, Arlington.UPNAWAY said:From a practicle standpoint what might be the most likely "areas outside of Ft Worth"?
Delta is technically all on airport property. Its not in the fence but its all owned by Delta or the Airport and leased to Delta. (including the Jetbase and Cargo)eolesen said:There's no shaking down to do at DFW... But, they could quite easily move the offices to Dallas, Las Colinas (Irving) or to Arlington, Grand Prairie, or Southlake. I know there were detailed discussions about 10-12 years ago on whether or not to move to downtown Dallas. The thought at the time was to have more of a voice on Love Field...
Logistically, it makes little difference whether or not the HDQ is located next to the airport or not. TW, CO, UA, and B6 seemed to managed well enough by having off-airport offices.
DL, NW, WN, AA and AS have/were always been next to the airport property, if not on-airport.
Internationally, KL, JL, MX, AM, DJ, VA and NH were all downtown headquarters complexes. CZ, MU, CX, QF, JJ, SR, and AV were/are at the airport.
I've got a lot of friends at UA who were impacted by the move from being out in the suburbs to being downtown Chicago. Four years ago, they hated the idea of having to take the train into the city. Fast forward to today, and they love it. It's opened up the ability for a whole different subset of employees to be recruited, mainly folks who don't own cars... That's a bigger issue in blue states than in Texas, but from personal experience, being able to take the train to/from work and use that downtime however I want to beats being stuck behind the wheel on 360, 183 or 121, hands down...
Well lots of US position will not transition, I have now idea how many but I would guess half at least. But that still leaves you adding thousands to AA HQ. Also there are many areas AA was very understaffed or not even doing that whole new departments are essintially being put together.Bob Owens said:Why do they need space? With the synergies they will be cutting heads.