Egypt Looking for Change?

How exactly is it facetious? I remember reading parts of the bill before it was passed. It was there for anyone who wanted to see it.
In fact, we debated the language in the bill/act/law (previous to its passage) at length right here in this forum.

But alas, that fact would get in the way of parroting a good talking point.
 
In fact, we debated the language in the bill/act/law (previous to its passage) at length right here in this forum.

But alas, that fact would get in the way of parroting a good talking point.

To a point of changes in House........then it went dark after much opposition from the majority.

"We have to pass it so they can see what's in it....."


How about...."Let them eat cake"

Travesty to our country...

YOU CALL THIS DEMOCRACY?
 
In fact, we debated the language in the bill/act/law (previous to its passage) at length right here in this forum.

But alas, that fact would get in the way of parroting a good talking point.

Yeah we did, but if you recall all the last minute behind the scene changes, voting proceeded before anyone had a chance to read the near 3k page monstrosity.

So to say that that the language was fully debated is a fracking lie and.............you know it.
 
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #230
"We have to pass it so they can see what's in it....."


I knew that this was what you were talking about but I did not think you would post it, at least not the entire quote. The "...." part that you left of is quite important in the meaning of the quote. The balance of the quote does not support the accusations made against Pelosie.

So are you going to post the remainder of the quote or are you going to continue to use this lie to support your position?
 
I knew that this was what you were talking about but I did not think you would post it, at least not the entire quote. The "...." part that you left of is quite important in the meaning of the quote. The balance of the quote does not support the accusations made against Pelosie.

So are you going to post the remainder of the quote or are you going to continue to use this lie to support your position?

If the bill was so good...
then why all the waivers?
 
I knew that this was what you were talking about but I did not think you would post it, at least not the entire quote. The "...." part that you left of is quite important in the meaning of the quote. The balance of the quote does not support the accusations made against Pelosie.

So are you going to post the remainder of the quote or are you going to continue to use this lie to support your position?

NO

PASSING A BILL THAT THE MAJORITY OPPOSE IS TYRANNY AND YOU FAIL TO SEE THAT AND YOU BUY INTO IT.


One statement (lie) out of many many by the President,Harry Reid, Pelosi, many Senators and Congressmen and you get your shorts in a knot. Looks like you bought her BS hook line and sinker.
 
Looks like now they want help from the people they scorned a week ago.
Get out, hey wait a minute.....


CAIRO (AP) -- Some of the young activists who launched the Egyptian uprising that toppled President Hosni Mubarak said Monday they are skeptical about the military's pledges to hand over power to a democratically elected government.

There concerns came as British Prime Minister David Cameron arrived in Cairo to meet with top Egyptian officials and "make sure this really is a genuine transition" to civilian rule.

More
 
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #234
NO

PASSING A BILL THAT THE MAJORITY OPPOSE IS TYRANNY AND YOU FAIL TO SEE THAT AND YOU BUY INTO IT.


One statement (lie) out of many many by the President,Harry Reid, Pelosi, many Senators and Congressmen and you get your shorts in a knot. Looks like you bought her BS hook line and sinker.


The only thin I was arguing in the above post was that fact that you lied when you posted only part of the sentence that Pelosie said. You and I both know it.

So since you are unwilling or incapable of being intellectually honest I will post it for you.

But we have to pass the bill so you can find out what is in it, away from the fog of the controversy.

Emphasis added on the MISSING part of the quote.
 
Go through the legislative process......that was a good one 777..

What was that trick **** move they pulled? I forget it now.....

Did you vote in the last election for a memeber of Congress? If you did then you must have been wasting your since you seem to think the legislative process is such a joke.
 
The only thin I was arguing in the above post was that fact that you lied when you posted only part of the sentence that Pelosie said. You and I both know it.

So since you are unwilling or incapable of being intellectually honest I will post it for you.



Emphasis added on the MISSING part of the quote.

She did say it didn't she?
And it is not a lie.

Explain the fog of the controversy?? Obviously she refers to the majority of people against it.

Tyranny, no ifs ands or buts.

Honestly now...that's the line I remember and thats the line I posted. And I don't give a damn what you think otherwise.
 
Did you vote in the last election for a memeber of Congress? If you did then you must have been wasting your since you seem to think the legislative process is such a joke.


The chicanery employed by the three branches of government(as Chuck Shumer puts it) to pass that garbage will go down in history no doubt.Apparently you just woke up and missed all the theater that was on display leading up to the passage of the bill and how America had negatively responded to this joke of a legislative process that you seem to hold so dear to your heart.
 
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #239
She did say it didn't she?
And it is not a lie.

Explain the fog of the controversy?? Obviously she refers to the majority of people against it.

Tyranny, no ifs ands or buts.

Honestly now...that's the line I remember and thats the line I posted. And I don't give a damn what you think otherwise.


No idea what she did or did not mean. I cannot read nor do I wish to read her mind. Quoting only part of what she said is intellectually dishonest at the very least. She was quoted incorrectly for a reason. Using only part of the quote says something entirely different than the using the complete quote. They used it out of context for the same reason you did.
 
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #240
She did say it didn't she?
And it is not a lie.

Explain the fog of the controversy?? Obviously she refers to the majority of people against it.

Tyranny, no ifs ands or buts.

Honestly now...that's the line I remember and thats the line I posted. And I don't give a damn what you think otherwise.


One could say the same thing about the chicanery used to start 2 wars with no way to pay for it but I am sure you won't. They are all crooks.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top