dapoes
Veteran
- May 17, 2008
- 3,543
- 2,716
Careful for what they wish for. They just might get it. Universally, democracy is being exalted. Everywhere one turns, one hears of its virtues: how democracy ensures human rights, fosters prosperity and shepherds in modernity. Yet democracy represents nothing more than the tyranny of the majority. In other words, contrary to the ideals of western liberalism, democracy does not ensure that the smallest minority, the individual is protected.
In the vast majority of circumstances, people free to choose their government get the government they desire. In Russia, the people have chosen again and again to elect KGB criminals. In Gaza, the people have chosen to elect either Hamas or Fatah, terrorist parties in perpetual war. Democracy does not a free society ensure.
Democracy is merely a system of election. it is not inherently good as its results are entirely predicated on the voters themselves. Freedom-loving peoples will generally establish a political system to protect freedom. Those who prefer strict rule will devise a political order that squelches it.
So just imagine now a state composed of people who have never known freedom, who lack a liberal western European heritage or any demonstrated proclivity towards its values, whose predominant religion demands a world incompatible with free society. And you are confident this romantic experiment in democracy is going to end well?
In the vast majority of circumstances, people free to choose their government get the government they desire. In Russia, the people have chosen again and again to elect KGB criminals. In Gaza, the people have chosen to elect either Hamas or Fatah, terrorist parties in perpetual war. Democracy does not a free society ensure.
Democracy is merely a system of election. it is not inherently good as its results are entirely predicated on the voters themselves. Freedom-loving peoples will generally establish a political system to protect freedom. Those who prefer strict rule will devise a political order that squelches it.
So just imagine now a state composed of people who have never known freedom, who lack a liberal western European heritage or any demonstrated proclivity towards its values, whose predominant religion demands a world incompatible with free society. And you are confident this romantic experiment in democracy is going to end well?