Man of the People
Advanced
- Jul 14, 2004
- 160
- 11
I personally dealt with the arbitrator in a previous case. Although the arbitrator had ruled in favor of some of our members in the past, he seemed to hold grudges. I know he was fired by the company as a neutral arbitrator several months ago. It's unclear whether it was due to this decision or a previous arbitration he ruled on. However, I do sense a problem with an arbitrator telling the company to settle this case out. An arbitrator is supposed to be neutral. He should not give advice to either side. It would be interesting to see if his ruling came down before or after he was fired by the company. If it was after, I would tend to guess his decision was based on seeking revenge against the company. To me, personally having met Dan a few times, he does have a flair for the unusual if you don't know him. He is not a moron. At times he will push the envelope, but he is not like most cowardly AMTs and isn't afraid to display his opinion and exercise all his constitutional rights. He did not do anything that warranted termination. This was a witch hunt against a man who stood by his beliefs. Unfortunately, the backpay award is minus any/all income earned during his time away. In other words, if Mr. Cunningham drew a salary from another job, let's say $70,000, and was due to make $100,000 in backpay, he will only receive the $30,000 difference. I would agree with previous posts, whoever the person was who handled the case for the company should be released. If someone reading this has the stroke to find out, I would be very curious to see a dollar amount associated with yet another company fiasco. Whether or not you like Dan or not, you need to know this: Any union loss in arbitrtation hurts the union. Likewise, it helps the company. Dan, glad to see you back B) On another note, it the decision should include all backpay, regardless of any income earned from the outside. If not, what would prevent the company from going after anyone in the future, disrupting their lives, knowing they might only have to pay a portion of backpay in the event the case goes to arbitration? Time to change the language in the contract.