eolesen
Veteran
- Jul 23, 2003
- 15,959
- 9,374
That's rich. AA pleaded with the DOJ? Really?WorldTraveler said:you and your ignorance of what actually took place are an absolute embarrassment. Your statements are so far from reality you would have to be on drugs to have made them.
AA/US pleaded with the DOT and DOJ to prohibit any legacy carriers from receiving the divested slots.
DOJ may have totally failed in their responsibilities with regard to competition, but that's due to their own incompetence. If you think AA had any influence on the decisions being made with regard to who got their slots, you're the one puffing away...
And yet, isn't DL's Pacific network its most profitable?WorldTraveler said:DL's best reward will come in knowing that the US airline system is NOT made of on protected markets and where they aren't blocked by ridiculous protectionistic laws, DL can and will win against AA and WN every time.... just like they have been doing.
What % of DL's Pacific network is subject to Open Skies and free competition?
Don't forget about China. DL's locked up two of the three state owned airlines, and has over 30% of the used frequencies right now. UA's following a similar approach, controlling 50% of the used frequencies, and codesharing with the remaining state owned airline. And yet, still DL won't fly nonstop into the larger partner's hub, knowing that neither UA or AA will bother with it because the DL partnership more or less locks up the feed there.FrugalFlyerv2.0 said:Boy, all this talk about crying to gov. authorities, protected markets, etc. sure sounds like the description of the operation DL is running in the "Tokyo market". i guess whole truth and winning aren't meant to go together ......................
Don't get me wrong -- it's a great strategy to lock out competitors. But let's not pretend that DL isn't playing the same game to a much larger degree than what WT might want to admit to.