I get the feeling that if the IAM ever tried to burn down a nursing home you'd show up just to argue with the firefighters.
^ THIS ^
Josh
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I get the feeling that if the IAM ever tried to burn down a nursing home you'd show up just to argue with the firefighters.
It certainly is alarming. I worked with Ira and Sito, so my opinion is first hand. Complete frauds and company rat scabs.
But, the membership isn't doomed. Just need some District leaders that push back. In organizing, my department pushed back and although I didn't get everything I wanted for the campaigns, it was enough to be successful. Same with representation imo. The problem with the HAL and UAL ta's was that the district eboard simply doesn't have anyone who pushes against the INTL. And none of the eboard members from US AIRWAYS are free to say that the UA ta sucked. That is very telling, especially when considering the future.
The INTL wants the quickest path to the dues. I get that part. Same with IBT, TWU, etc, imo.
Thus, strong district and Local leaders pushing against that would have prevented the dopey anti labor United TA and the horrific anti labor and pro 'Right to Work For Less' HAL contract.
It is too early to tell which way Delaney goes at US AIRWAYS in a TA. I use history as my schoolmaster though. Thus, my hunch is that these NC guys are all kissing arse to keep their position and will let a ta slip by that has drop dead dates and not the sorta scope that they have been promising. To be honest, they simply don't have the skill set or knowledge to know the difference either so they most likely will listen to Delaney.
When you have over 3,000 members in CLT and you get 50 people to a union meeting, the membership is apathetic and has been for over 20 years.
You do realize you havent had a section 6 contract since 99, two chapter 11 cases, and one Transition agreement, and finally Section 6 negotiations.
What happens at united is critically significant since a strong contract there will help our negotiations at us.
700, meeting attendance has nothing to do with apathy. Maybe it did 20 years ago but not now. Why should someone go to a meeting unless they are running for office? People used to go to meetings in the last century but we have something called the internet now so everyone not running for office gets updates and all their info online.
I have a big hangup with those who talk down to the masses and claim the masses are apathetic cuz they dont want to hear how much the local light bill cost
Let's face it Tim; the IAM's organizing campaign slogan when they organized US Fleet was "strength in numbers". It proved to be effective enough to win representation of a work group who did not understand the details. MTC. and Related, although IAM members, are part of a seperate bargaining unit. To my recollection, and I have been in the industry for 33 years, I don't recall the NMB ever releasing two seperate bargaining units, on the same property at the same time. With that being said... the strength in numbers campaign slogan is somewhat of a paper lion. Different unions under the IAM banner? No. They are however, different bargaining units. Based on how the RLA is written and how the NMB and the Federal Government would view contract negotiations; the two groups might as well be different unions. AH and any domestic carrier with labor on the property loves it. Divide and conquer! So much for strength in numbers.Kev, that is exactly what id love to install instead of separatism. Things are so separate, by design, that im not even sure most will miss the iam mx if ibt takes over. It shouldnt be that way but its like two very different unions under the iam banner. AH loves it!