Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
america west pilots threat.
The pilot referenced in paragraph 85 was forced to seek the assistance of US Airways in dealing with multiple threats he received by both telephone and e-mail in response to his interest in becoming a USAPA representative. Upon information and belief, one such electronic communication sent by defendant Abbott on or about May 12,
2008, inquired as to when a “blanket party” would be held for this pilot. Upon information and belief, a “blanket party” refers to a method of assault in which attackers restrain and blind their victim by throwing a blanket over the victim’s head, and then strike the victim repeatedly. The same pilot has been subjected to the threat of a concerted effort by multiple pilots to put him on a “no fly” list in order to severely limit or eliminate his work opportunities.
On or about May 9, 2008, a doll with “USAPA” written on it was discovered hanging from a noose inside the cockpit of a US Airways aircraft that landed at Lambert Airport in St. Louis, Missouri.
I think you summed it up adequately.EastUS1 said:Certainly so, especially if any potential argument's based on "and missed any reference to the present situation", as this scenario's quite clearly, previously unexplored territory. RR properly observes this with: "It makes an observation at the end about just how litle case law exists from M/B." It would appear axiomatic though, that MB law was/is intended to prevent the wholesale obliteration of any group's very representational existence whenever mergers/SLI issues are involved. From merely a layman's perspective; allowing anything of that sort would seem entirely counterintuitive to the law's very intent.
EastUS1 said:electricjet98: Time to take it to those westicle Spartans...show them who the real boss is. Surely a fine specimen of mucho macho such as yourself will triumph over these silly Spartans!
For a long time passing; I'd have agreed with you there, but "you'se", as a group, consistently demonstrate a level of unearned and entirely unsupportable arrogance that's usually only found in troubled adolescents. I'm nowadays, more of the opinion that what's commonly shared here, is little more than all involved being carbon-based-life-forms.
Serously: What sort of supposed "pilots' or even "adults" could EVER even begin to produce the following?..."knights"/"dire wolves".."many battles"..."valor"/etc ad nauseum. I'll leave you "Lords and Ladies" to consider your ridiculous behavior as you see fit to.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YT8H9smpK3U&feature=c4-overview-vl&list=PL5DCDEE4D2ADA2659
EastUS1 said:Sigh! Give at least this your very best shot and then get back to us all. Who knows? You could perhaps found the very first "spartan" chapter? https://www.us.mensa...26C0C3BFF4B267D
Once more: I give you your brain-trust and finest "minds" at work, mighty "spartans".
PS: snap..How'd the testing go? Can all now look forward to welcoming a whole new chapter of "spartans"?
Did Braid really do that? Post it! I'd like to see that! "Good thing we don't step in it"!EastUS1 said:Hmm...Another minus vote. Must one assume the testing didn't go well, or in properly heroic and impressive "spartan" style; wasn't even attempted? Sheesh!...And for years, we've been hearing how tough, principled and integrity ridden "you'se" all are....? No matter. Take comfort in the fact that even utter morons can hit a mouse or keyboard to enter a vote, so your voices need never be stilled.
Speaking of morons, village idiots and the like though: Shouldn't "you'se" guys be putting out another video by now? We can always use a few more laughs.....even though, purely for laughs; it's difficult to imagine any real improvement on what's already been offered....Lords and Ladies/dire wolves/valorous knights, and even wizards with Larry Potta. Arguably though; the funniest one ever was that of David Braid virtually licking the ground the 9th circuit court stood on, whilst lispingly providing narrative that it was "a massive display of legal authority" (kids seeing the "big city" for the first time, I guess)....Soon after, of course, to be completely disregarded by any/all "spartans".....
end_of_alpa said:Did Braid really do that? Post it! I'd like to see that! "Good thing we don't step in it"!
PullUp said:Oversimplification. Not everyone has to be at loggerheads all the time over every issue, dude.
No matter what public stance APA is taking on this now, compromise will ultimately rule the day.
APA wants to avoid inheriting a dfr lawsuit. That has value.
APA wants to get beyond the SLI and onto the next phase - new contract negotiations. That has value.
APA wants (as we all do) to eliminate uncertainty as to how the new seniority list will look. Arbitration adds uncertainty. There is value in avoiding arbitration.
These are excellent reasons to avoid arbitration, and settle on a combined seniority list during the negotiations phase.
The other reason is that eventually all LCC pilots will be paying dues to APA and contributing ideas, energy, and capital towards (hopefully) common goals. That goodwill has value also.
I would not be surprised if the seniority issues are being worked out now.
Cheers.
APA doesn't give a ratz a$z about a seniority lawsuit. Hello. Look at their history.traderjake said:That's why the Nicolau Award will be used.
Keep that DOH dream alive though.