strikeforce
Veteran
- Jan 18, 2011
- 1,224
- 253
You won't see that again Bob.. NW went to the extreme because AMFA totally dumbfounded management there. They were used to their company lapdog union the IAM there. They had to deal with ALPA but AMFA was too militant for them. We had them over a barrel in 2001 (pre 9/11) thats why I enjoyed a 13 dollar an hr raise and my retirement more than doubled in our very first contract. But we did all our work in house at the time and NW was ill prepared for a MX strike in 2001. But they spent a fortune recruiting mechanics and pulled out all the stops to bust AMFA in 2005 and I dare to say with the help of other airlines as well as UAL and FX and all the others who were all in the trenches trying to get AMFA on board..No other airline wanted that they wanted to keep their lapdog unions like the IAM and TWU. I can honestly say the TWU will NEVER get to the point of impasse and if they do it will never get to a strike situation. AA will never have the need to try to recruit scabs as long as their favorite lapdog union is there.
[/quote
Nothing but the truth!
Although, some may be scratching their heads as to why AA all of the sudden needs 900 mechanics, especially after a RIF just 6 months ago. Has the workload in TUL and the Class 1's increased that much to warrant those numbers? In ORD, it seems that we have less overnights and reduced OT. The other thing that's puzzling is....AA was paying $0 for the lease at MCI base and correct me if I'm wrong, but 3 million per year for AFW..... why didn't AA close AFW and move those operations to DWH? Where's Bob Owens?