Overspeed
Veteran
- Jun 27, 2011
- 3,245
- 1,065
Chuck Schalk said:
Too bad the former AMFA dues paying members from NWA, UAL, and AS can't vote to fire AMFA for their superior job protection performance.
Fact is that under the TWU scope protection by any measure more jobs are done inhouse where under AMFA scope clauses. AA would love to have the AMFA scope clause in place here. Why? UAL has four to five dock lines under the legacy AMFA scope clause. If that were in place at AA all TUL airframe would be gone just leaving DWH. How about AMFA's WN scope clause at AA? Well no engine overhaul at all, no PALM, and four lines of airframe overhaul. WN outsources more than 60% of their maintenance while AA even under the BK langauge can't go above 35%.
AMFA provides more low wage MRO jobs than any other union, hands down.
http://web.mit.edu/airlinedata/www/2012%2012%20Month%20Documents/Employees%20and%20Productivity/MX/Percent%20of%20Maintenance%20Expenses%20Outsourced.htm
wrong again genius, what part about may be exceeded don't you understand? see language of the the TWU contract:
The below is from our 2012 TWU Aircraft maintenance and Related Contract Article 1.
[SIZE=10pt](E)[/SIZE][SIZE=10pt] The Company and the Union agree to limit the percentage of all outsourced Aircraft-related Maintenance to not exceed 35%, subject to exclusions or modifications described elsewhere in this agreement. Further, the parties also agree that no more than 15% of Line Maintenance work will be contracted out. [/SIZE]
[SIZE=10pt]The percentage set forth in [/SIZE][SIZE=10pt]paragraph (E)[/SIZE][SIZE=10pt] above may be exceeded in the event: (i) the Company’s then-present employees do not have the normal time and/or skills to perform the work (provided that the manpower shortage is not a result of the Company’s failure to reasonably anticipate and address its headcount requirements); or (ii) the Company’s equipment or facilities are insufficient or are being fully utilized at the time the Company contracts out the work. [/SIZE]
Another distortion Chuck. The language is to cover sudden high volume work or short term specialized work. If AA is going to add new work that is long term, it cannot violate the percentage. The facilities cannot be undersized intentionally to outsource work. That is not the purpose of the exceedance clause.
If you are the type of rep we can expect under AMFA and can't even read a contract then you are the poster boy for why we should not go AMFA. It is run and pushed by people that claim to be professionals but act like uneducated fools.