Let's try to get back on topic.
What do people REALLY think the APA will end up getting? It will be interesting given that all the contracts come up at the same time. If they had been staggered, I would imagine the first group negotiating would get the most. With all three up at the same time, AA has a better case for saying if we give everyone 3%, example, this is the cost. By having one at a time, the union could say that market conditions may differ when contracts 2 & 3 come up so let's not even consider that.
Additionally, I assume AA actually wants this to play into next year. With the economy possible moving toward a recession (likely causing losses in transportation), AA can argue that hey, there is no money...we're losing money. I would imagine at that point, extensions would be the more likely option.
Given the frailty of the economy, I would venture to guess that the Bush admin would be included to issue a PEB should a strike happen.
I also have a question...regarding the negotiating terms APA inserted into their proposal, are they trying to contractually circumvent the law by setting a timeline for negotiating, arbitration & self help (strike)? If so, can AA even sign that? Wouldn't that be the equivalent of signing a contract to kill someone...you can't be contractually held to something that is against the law...or am I mis-reading their terms.
Thanks!