Another School Massacre

SparrowHawk said:
“Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety”
 
AMEN! And without Freedom; life ain't worth anything anyway.
 
So its ok for innocent kids and adults to be slaughtered and do nothing about it?
 
10363902_643212899105101_8484913083791788097_n.jpg
 
700UW said:
So its ok for innocent kids and adults to be slaughtered and do nothing about it?
 
Nope. I'd kill any such murderous azzhole intent on such, only if/when the situation required, or die trying. Do you carry a weapon yourself, so as to actually be able to do somehing about such a scenario should it present?....Or do you just want "mommy" to always make everything "better" for you in your pathetic little pretend Fantasyland?...And only from your own weakness, insist on assaulting the Rights of others?
 
There there,...I didn't mean to be mean widdle wun. Just have a nice widdle wowypop and pwetend it's a perfect world...and that "mommy" will always be there for you...if you just pass enough laws. ;)
 
xUT said:
Well, I don't know where that came from.
What's your point?
Only rebublirats are nuts or demorats are nuts ?
 
Do some checking, those sicko's were liberal Democrats.
 
700UW said:
31 shootings since columbine, yet not one shoe bomber since that incident.
No reason to believe the current security regulations are responsible. As I recall their have been one.or two children who have snuck on airplanes with out being detected. One person hid in a wheel well. The list goes on.
 
700UW said:
So its ok for innocent kids and adults to be slaughtered and do nothing about it?
I don't think its ok but it was a away to late now to do anything about it.
 
700UW said:
So its ok for innocent kids and adults to be slaughtered and do nothing about it?
 
Perhaps a good pace to start would be the indiscriminate prescription of psychotropic drugs by Big Pharma.
 
Also a revision of civil commitment rules may help keep guns out of the hands of those who are a danger to themselves and others.
 
700UW said:
Mental Health checks being part of the background check will certainly be a good start.
 
The VA Tech shooter was found mentally ill by the courts, yet he was allowed to purchase what he did, because mental health checks are not legal.
 
And no where did I state that I was in favor of banning guns, I own several myself.
 
Very slippery slope...they already been phucking over vets with this crap.
 
And what med's did you say you are taking?
 
20K my way.....
 
SparrowHawk said:
 
Perhaps a good pace to start would be the indiscriminate prescription of psychotropic drugs by Big Pharma.
 
Also a revision of civil commitment rules may help keep guns out of the hands of those who are a danger to themselves and others.
There are roughly 30k gun deaths a year.  I don't think that is going to do jack to stem that tied.
 
 
Number of deaths for leading causes of death:
  • Heart disease: 597,689
  • Cancer: 574,743
  • Chronic lower respiratory diseases: 138,080
  • Stroke (cerebrovascular diseases): 129,476
  • Accidents (unintentional injuries): 120,859
  • Alzheimer's disease: 83,494
  • Diabetes: 69,071
  • Nephritis, nephrotic syndrome, and nephrosis: 50,476
  • Influenza and Pneumonia: 50,097
  • Intentional self-harm (suicide): 38,364
CDC
 
700UW, on 29 May 2014 - 4:46 PM, said:
Mental Health checks being part of the background check will certainly be a good start.
delldude said:
 
Very slippery slope...they already been phucking over vets with this crap.
 
And what med's did you say you are taking?
 
20K my way.....
 
VERY slippery indeed dell. Perhaps the VERY last thing any actually sane person should EVER want to see is government "standards" for supposed sanity....You know, kinda' like those easily adjustable "standards" used by Lois Lerner and her disgusting sorts within the Infernal Revenue...?
 

Latest posts

Back
Top