Strake said:Layoffs Under the amfa's watch:
NWA- 4,876 (47.1%) layed off Detroit News
Aproximately 6,000 at UAL under the amfa's watch.
And then there is the 600 at Alaska. In fact if you do the math, aproximately 38% of the amfa's membership has been layed off. At one time the amfa represented almost 30,000 workers. Now they represent aproximately 18,000. The number of layed off TWU/AA workers is closer to 3500. You amfa guys are soooo weak. It's sad really.
[post="193668"][/post]
The article makes no mention of 4,876 layoff. It notes an overall reduction of 4,876, which by the way includes close to 2,000 retirements. Let's not forget AMFA did more than double the retirement pay at NWA. Now if you want to compare real numbers, use the recall list.
Also, you truly can't be that ignorant or maybe you're just embarassed of your beloved IAM and their UAL track record. IAM allowed massive layoffs in INDY in 2000, 2001, and 2002, IAM refuses to negotiate concessions in June 2002 under the chant of "No Concessions," IAM gets a deal rejected in November 2002, IAM and UAL get told by the ATSB that it doesn't matter what they negotiated, UAL has an unreasonable financial projection, IAM lays down in front of the BK judge in Jan 2003, under IAM's watch, UAL layoffs 6,000 in March 2003, IAM negotiates and settles contract which allows those previously laid off to remain laid off and allows outsourcing of overhaul, IAM gets booted in July 2003.
But yet your ignorant self continues to blame AMFA.
BTW...What about the 7,000 documented jobs the twu lost, why no response? You're losing the layoff fight and you gutted the contract also, do you feel good loser.