La Li Lu Le Lo
Veteran
- May 29, 2010
- 7,414
- 2,649
I doubt very seriously the airlines asked for the no layoff clause in the agreement for the assistance.It was the airlines who were poking the gov to step in the first time for assistance, NOT the unions.
So? They go on unemployment and find another job just like every other swinging dick in America.The second round of assistance was kicked off by unions, fully supported by the airlines, including A4A who also contacted congressional leaders pushing the support as well as letting congressional leaders know how bad it will get come Oct 1st if there were no extensions granted.
Oh? Then why were NONE of the protections extended to management and support staff?I know you two minds will not change about this being an entitlement by the unions, but, it's actually an employee based assistance not so much union based at all.
Yes exactly, they have had 6 months. If they can't get their finances in order in 6 months or come up with some sort of exit plan that is their problem. Extending CARES for them to sit on their ass..... well you just make THEIR problem MY problem. How is that fair to John Q. Taxpayer to be burdened with supporting someone who makes far more than they do to sit on their ass and collect a check.Sure, it's probably kicking the can down the road, but so what, give the lower senior folks another 6 months to stash the cash and prepare (they should already have done this this past 6 months) but hey, some probably couldn't get all their monies in order.
CARES is nothing more than Democrats pandering to a traditionally Democrat voting base. I am sure the Democrats themselves will resist renewing it so they can blame Trump and secure votes from laid off, disenfranchised people. That is true to manipulative Democrat tactics.