Who said anything about a "merger"?
Really?
The article YOU posted mentions it, discusses it, and even list AA and UAL as the two main ones. Here are some para's from YOUR posting that mention merger/consolidation, mash together, combining ect...
Airline mergers aren’t easy. Unionized workforces that rank pilots based on seniority, for example, make it hard to
mash companies together. And competition regulators don’t like it when too much power ends up in the hands of too few players, though U.S. antitrust authorities have permitted some industries, such as mobile telephone operators,
to concentrate to just three players.
But consolidating makes financial sense. Most other countries have a single flag carrier implicitly or explicitly backed by the state. America doesn’t,
but pandemic bailouts have made the Big Four quasi-government-owned, giving the public a stake in their future.
And merging hasn’t worked out too badly for consumers so far. Ticket prices adjusted for inflation have halved since 1995, when America’s skies were awash with carriers, according to the Bureau of Transportation Statistics.
American, which has lapped up $13.5 billion in taxpayer cash, is in the worst position. United is next but with debt levels only half as daunting.
A deal may be better for taxpayers than restructuring. One between American and a rival might mean ditching routes. Shareholders of the healthier partner may balk at taking on added problems. But cheap government funding could help.
And regulators also have a history of turning blind eyes to competition concerns during a crisis, such as in 2008 when JPMorgan bought Bear Stearns and Bank of America scooped up Merrill Lynch. If the alternative is bankruptcy, a merger stamped by the government can’t be ruled out.
Bolding highlighted by me.