Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
eolesen said:Nah, the spin will be that AA is doomed to fly empty airplanes because DL forced them to start up the route in the slow season.
WorldTraveler said:It simply says that HND service is highly variable in seasonality, DL played by the rules to get the route originally, retained that right, and has now decided it isn't worth keeping the flight as well as LAX-HND going into the fall and winter.
As much as some thought AA was going to RIP the HND slot from DL's hands, DL made a COMMERCIALLY BASED decision on what was best and acted accordingly.
AA will now be forced to start LAX-HND going into the winter from LAX against two other carriers that already operate the route.
Further, if AA goes ahead and cancels its LAX-NRT flight - as they indicated before they would do - AA doesn't gain much and DL might actually end up better off since it currently carries significantly more revenue per passenger. IN the 4th quarter of 2014, DL's average fare for LAX-NRT was 60% higher than AA and its total LAX-NRT revenue was 83% higher than AA's.
Further, DL's LAX-HND average fare is higher than LAX-NRT so AA might be banking on getting higher average fares from HND but there is no certainty that they won't trail DL from HND just as they have from NRT.
FInally, DL is using the 763ER to HND but they very well could put a larger aircraft including the 333 on LAX-HND which has only marginally higher trip costs and a CASM as low as or lower than anything AA flies.
So let's see the next steps of how this plays out but if AA drops LAX-NRT - while the yen continues to climb compared to even a year ago - and DL upgrades LAX-HND, then it might not be the huge victory that some might think it will be.
You really had to ask that?dariencc said:
Are you mental?
ah that would be yes.dariencc said:
Are you mental?