Tim Nelson
Veteran
and that was sad because, our group had it in our contract, explicitly saying. Not the stews.It was withdrawn after the AFA lost their grievance on the issue since the language was pretty much the same.
and that was sad because, our group had it in our contract, explicitly saying. Not the stews.It was withdrawn after the AFA lost their grievance on the issue since the language was pretty much the same.
as always, you are wrong. If you actually ever did read your contract, its right there in black and white. The stews never had the language.AAnotok I or he shouldn’t have to be answered this I believe what Weez said is correct in fact I don’t think our language was considered as good as the Fa,s
Lol the amt sure managed to look like a dumbass didn’t he? Lol
and that was sad because, our group had it in our contract, explicitly saying. Not the stews.
as always, you are wrong. If you actually ever did read your contract, its right there in black and white. The stews never had the language.
Our union did what it always does, withdraw.
as always, you are wrong. If you actually ever did read your contract, its right there in black and white. The stews never had the language.
Our union did what it always does, withdraw.[/QUOTE
I don’t think the Association is a failure since it’s going to continue to be an ongoing entity from now into the future likely long after you and I are gone.
What the Association is is just that. Two representive bodies existing separately but trying to find common ground due to a merger of two airlines into one that personally I’ve seen an absolute substantial benefit from so far.
Despite our loses in the AMR Bankruptcy I highly doubt we would have seen a roughly 40% increase in our wages without that merger IMO.
AMR had it survived would have forced us to live our Contracts in full with no adjustments for the entire 5 year term plus.
Here is some stuff for you shorty.
https://www.bls.gov/ooh/media-and-communication/writers-and-authors.htm
Your new career outlook
The IAMNPF won’t be frozen.
Do you have a crystal ball?
US scope prevents the company from farming out line, at AA they can farm out anything and everything up to 35% of the maintenance budget.
At US they can farm out 50% of billible hours of heavy maintenance.
Components were farmed out because of the CBA abrogation.
Why should LUS take concessions for LAA to make gains?
The IAM and TWU are working together in negotiations, yet every holiday that LAA doesn’t have they come on here and bash the LUS mechanics for the superior laungage in regard to holidays, sick and overtime.
Crickets? Unlike you newbie, I'm not paid to troll this BB.
I would still prefer what they have over what we have!
Besides, what does a baggage handler know about what's important to an AMT?
Guys like you, are a huge part of why - we are where we are! Stuck with no end in sight.
... two people that are actually one...maybe two people here would have believed you
I guess we will disagree as to if the association is a failure or not. I base my judgement on past performance. To date they have failed the AMT group as far as I`m concerned. What the future holds is anybody guess. I`m hoping we can one day have a voice in who we want representing us.
I agree on the wages. However I question is it was due to the association or in spite of it. The company needed/wanted cross-utilization. AFAIK we have no idea how that transpired. Did the association negotiate that raise or was it offered up by the company? IDK, I do not remember seeing any updates or negotiations on the wage bump.
Ok if they’ve been a failure to date then can you tell me what Union in the industry has been a success? Honestly if you can find one in your mind that really has been for your Class and Craft then you should go all out to bring them in.
BTW I don’t think any Union can be a success if we can’t be satisfied with what’s ever negotiated for us?
I could bet if these guys negotiated $50.00 per hour for my Group, all Scope work and free Medical for life it still wouldn’t pass by 100% yes.
Well if you think it was in spite of it then you have to think AA Management is a fair and loving friend, brother or father.
I think I’ve alluded enough times that we in Fleet owe those raises to the AMT’s. Doesn’t take much to put two and two together as to what I’m talking about.
And BTW FYI I have no love for the IAM as an “organization” for not joining in on any of the TWU protests without an explanation. Again the only thing I can assume is that they are scared of violating that language they have that says they won’t protest the Company?
I guess we will disagree as to if the association is a failure or not. I base my judgement on past performance. To date they have failed the AMT group as far as I`m concerned. What the future holds is anybody guess. I`m hoping we can one day have a voice in who we want representing us.
I agree on the wages. However I question is it was due to the association or in spite of it. The company needed/wanted cross-utilization. AFAIK we have no idea how that transpired. Did the association negotiate that raise or was it offered up by the company? IDK, I do not remember seeing any updates or negotiations on the wage bump.[/QThe problem is we did not vote for the Association. That makes you very leery from the start. We've also probably lost quite a bit of money due to the difficulties negotiating from the 2 unions positions. Having 2 different deals with the one work group is not a harmonious situation but it is what it is. Bankruptcy and mergers are not easy to navigate. I'm biding my time and reserving judgement and waiting to see what happens. I also have little trust for this mgmt team. Not impressed, but then again the last mgmt group that was worth anything here was Crandall and co.