i believe we all agree on that. cutting different size slices of a pie that never expands has been discussed..including theorizing the lus/insurance in exchange for a bigger pie (an additional cookie or two for lus).
the issue here is how to get aa to expand the pie:
- increased profits? parker has bragged about aa's finances going forward. they aren't obliged to expand our pie due to aa's self-perceived brighter financial future...and i don't believe they are generous enough to do so.
- labor strife? well, the idea alone can be considered a job action in today's world. here, i don't see us nowhere near organized enough at the lowest level(s) and a key conduit, crew chiefs; many are 'heroes' and a few others don't wish to jeopardize their jobs/benefits of handshake agreements (overtime) with management by 'going by the book'.
the AMTs are key. the AMTs scare the company by their ability of delaying flights/putting planes out of service. it's my belief and others, that the AMTs were the tipping point for our august 2016 raises.
in that sense, fleet does ride their coat tails and the assoc. needs the AMTs more than the AMTs need us.
so, be nice and make nice with aircraft maintenance.