AANOTOK
Veteran
- Oct 10, 2009
- 4,627
- 2,242
Believe what, NYer, that AA wants everything as stated in those three sources. Or we are on the cusp of an agreement? Or both...
American Airlines and Labor Negotiations
- Thread starter Buck
- Start date
- Status
NYer
Veteran
- Jun 4, 2010
- 4,167
- 905
Believe what, NYer, that AA wants everything as stated in those three sources. Or we are on the cusp of an agreement? Or both...
"They want everything."
That's an opinion.
Last edited:
Tim Nelson
Veteran
that was a straight up lie by the union. With the secrecy of talks, the iam can say whatever it wanrs. No accountability.Believe what, NYer, that AA wants everything as stated in those three sources. Or we are on the cusp of an agreement? Or both...
Yes I believe the update was embellished to put the blame on the company when both entities are at fault
WeAAsles
Veteran
- Oct 20, 2007
- 23,453
- 5,257
Ok so I’m still confused then here? Will we have a TA in 2 weeks or 2 years?
2 weeks?
2 years?
Yea and I think I would leave the marching on a man’s home idea to John Samuelsen if it’s needed. He already did it to the boss of the MTA.
Runwaysticker
Advanced
- Dec 24, 2007
- 179
- 17
BUT A VOTE IS A V0TE THEY DONY CARE
Besides Weez he was showing his Phoenix property.
Jester
Veteran
I cannot support such actions as to be little more than harassment at someone's private home with their family. Not as if we unable air our grievances and dissatisfaction by town hall gatherings, airport/corporate HQ picketing or online message board bantering.
I think it is a very inappropriate topic to broach.
gulfcoast1
Senior
- Apr 10, 2016
- 394
- 30
I cannot vote yes for anything with that much outsourcing and I think most of us will not. Outsourcing anything at all would be the main thing that would cause me to vote no. Not a good move on the company's part unless Crema is correct and they will come in at the last minute and agree to a Scope that includes most of what we do now. Not a good move at all. A lot of high seniority people want to do jobs other than loading and unloading and newer employees will have to worry about layoffs. I do not see any way something like that would pass.
ograc
Veteran
- Jan 30, 2012
- 1,868
- 1,624
"When and where so directed". A double edge sword. Can be beneficial in gaining work. Can also be used, particularly in our case, by the company as a vehicle to take work away. Should we be complacent in the proposed and potential job loss included in this latest proposal by the company? The details of their proposal are coming to light. And they are not good. Disappointing we are discussing conceding jobs to a company making record profits. The company's true posture, regarding reaching a JCBA, should be apparent to all. Negotiating as if we are still in bankruptcy. It is, however, the unfortunate truth of the matter.
The magic bullet is the buyout that will entice yes votes out of many that will take the money and run with no regard to what they leave behind. That's why the association needs to force the company to offer the buyout first. They should refuse to allow it in the contract or a condition if a yes vote carries.
Racer X
Veteran
- Feb 20, 2016
- 593
- 49
Actually I believe based on those 3 facts or whatever....it puts us further away from a T/A
OP
- Aug 20, 2002
- 7,319
- 1,555
- Thread Starter
- Thread starter
- #6,553
The fact that United's Fleet Service has "unlimited part time" could a problem?
Racer X
Veteran
- Feb 20, 2016
- 593
- 49
It’s not an opinion that if the language proposed by the company has “ more when and where so directed work “ then the company wants the ability to take whatever they want. That language gives them that right. If they don’t want that right then why propose the language?
Racer X
Veteran
- Feb 20, 2016
- 593
- 49
I havnt heard any further discussion on the pt cap language lately.
- Status
