First question; No.
Second; Yes. By agreeing to the wage increase to work each others metals was a financial and tactic move by the co. which turns out to be a great move by the company. This was the largest last leverage option held by the asso. and they "agreed" to let that go. I have said this from day one when the co. offered this increase right smack dabb in the middle of nego a contract and not even discussing economics yet. Fact is the co. needed it so bad they were willing to pay the 22% increases to get it as per article posted above.
My opinion was that the asso. could have easily held out for more added benefits increased for the LAA side to be brought up to the LUS side and or visa versa, but the asso. caved to just the $$$$ dollar signs and therefore released their largest leverage they ever had with this merger. I understand very slightly why the asso. did it, but it could have been handled and negotiated a lot better instead of just once again agreeing to what the company is offering. Watch how they handle the 3% or 7% over D or U. They will once again just agree to what the company will offer, which we are all hearing it's the D+3% reduced from the promised D+7%. I actually hope the mechanics can get the D+7% as promised to them at the town hall meetings by Parker personally, that's what the asso. should fight for for the mechanics.
Forgot to post the article I was referring to about the 22% increases. BTW, were they really 22% to bring the mechanics to where they are currently?
American Airlines pilots expose frailty of CEO's $1 billion labor bet